Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep 13;96(6):3194–3208. doi: 10.1152/jn.00484.2006

TABLE 2.

Properties of synaptic responses to stimulation of thalamic afferents in cells in auditory thalamocortical slices

n LatMo, ms AEPSP, mV tHW.EPSP ms
All interneurons 55 5.33±1.77* 5.26±3.73* 26.1±16.9*
All pyramid cells 27 4.01±1.30 10.5±5.74 34.8±15.8
LI & II primary interneurons 12 5.20±1.75 4.20±3.10§ 17.1±7.28,§
LIII-V primary interneurons 14 4.67±2.03 *5.63±3.55 36.9±23.3
LI & II shell interneurons 8 *5.72±1.63 *6.31±5.33 27.3±15.3
LIII-V shell interneurons 21 *5.70±1.62 *5.23±3.51 24.2±12.8
Primary pyramidal cells 17 3.77±1.55 11.7±5.96 35.8±17.6
Shell pyramidal cells 10 4.40±0.796 9.05±3.33 36.0±10.4

Values are means ± SD.

*

Significantly different from primary pyramidal cells, Student’s t-test, P < 0.0167. There was a significant effect of cell type on all three parameters [1-way ANOVA, LatMn:F(5.81)=4.002. P < 0.01: AEPSP:F(5.81)=6.748. P < 10-4: tHW EPSP:F(5.81)=3.556. P <0.01]. Other symbols indicate statistically significant differences between groups as assayed by Bonferoni’s or Dunnett’s T-3 post-hoc tests (P < 0.05):

different from primary LIII-V interneurons;

different from shell pyramidal cells;

§

different from primary and shell pyramidal cells.