Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Polymer (Guildf). 2006 Dec 8;47(26):8595–8603. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.015

Table 1.

Epoxide compounds tested using mercury dilatometry listed in decreasing volume change by %ROM.

Compound %TVC %ROM % Filler Hard Tests
1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (14) −4.3 −8.3 ± 2.0 % 64 YES 6
glycidyl phenyl ether (4) −4.2 −8.0 ± 0.7 % 68 NO 4
1,2,7,8-diepoxyoctane (12) −3.8 −8.0 ± 5.1 % 75 YES 3
glycerol diglycidyl ether (16) −4.0 −7.3 ± 1.6 % 64 YES 4
neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether (15) −3.0 −5.2 ± 0.8 % 63 YES 3
CYGEP (20) −3.0 −5.2 ± 1.0 % 62 YES 7
ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (13) −2.5 −5.0 ± 0.9 % 71 YES 5
2-ethylhexyl glycidyl ether (8) −2.1 −4.2 ± 0.8 % 74 NO 8
UVR-6105 (18) −2.2 −4.0 ± 0.6 % 66 NO 7
bis(4-glycidyloxyphenyl) methane (17) −2.5 −3.9 ± 1.7 % 68 YES 3
PHEPSI (19) −1.5 −2.7 ± 0.9 % 64 YES 5
2-biphenyl glycidyl ether (6) −1.7 −2.5 ± 0.3 % 56 NO 5
2,3-epoxy-propyl-4′-methoxyphenyl ether (5) −1.4 −2.2 ± 1.5 % 60 NO 2
glycidyl 4-nonylphenyl ether (9) −1.2 −2.1 ± 0.2 % 68 NO 4
diglycidyl-1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylate (10) −0.81 −1.5 ± 0.4 % 64 NO 3
1,2,5,6-diepoxycyclooctane (11) −0.31 −0.56 ± 0.52 % 66 NO 5
styrene oxide (3) −0.12 −0.21 ± 0.42 % 66 NO 3

Note: Standard deviations are at a confidence level of 95%.