Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Polymer (Guildf). 2006 Dec 8;47(26):8595–8603. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.015

Table 2.

Methacrylate compounds tested using mercury dilatometry listed in decreasing volume change by %ROM.

Compound %TVC %ROM % Filler Hard Tests
HEMA (22) −6.9 −13.0 ± 0.7 % 69 YES 4
TEGDMA (41) −6.2 −11.5 ± 0.6 % 71 YES 7
DEGDMA (30) −4.8 −10.4 ± 0.8 % 72 YES 8
HBMA (24) −5.4 −9.8 ± 1.3 % 69 YES 3
HPMA (23) −5.7 −9.6 ± 1.2 % 74 YES 7
EGDMA (39) −4.4 −8.5 ± 1.1 % 69 YES 4
EG dicyclopentenyl ether MA (29) −3.7 −6.8 ± 0.4 % 72 YES 5
isobornyl MA (34) −2.7 −4.7 ± 0.5 % 68 YES 4
glycidyl MA (27) −2.0 −3.7 ± 0.8 % 68 NO 4
EG phenyl ether MA (28) −2.0 −3.7 ± 0.4 % 69 NO 10
DEG methyl ether MA (31) −1.5 −3.6 ± 1.1 % 80 NO 5
stearyl MA (25) −1.8 −3.3 ± 0.4 % 71 NO 10
cyclohexyl MA (40) −1.3 −3.2 ± 0.7 % 74 NO 7
EG methyl ether MA (26) −1.2 −2.4 ± 1.0 % 71 NO 4

Note: Standard deviations are at a confidence level of 95%.