Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 11;2(4):e360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000360

Table 1. Summary of tree statistics and major phylogenetic findings in the simultaneous analyses of ribosomal data of Chrysomelidae using parsimony (Direct Optimization, DO) and maximum likelihood (ML) tree reconstructions.

DO BLAST (ML)
Tree statistics
Aligned sites 4579 3304
Variable sitesa 2648 (484) 1357 (409)
Informative sitesa 1279 (331) 921 (266)
parsimony tree length 10105 [10467]b
likelihood score [45699.7872]c 35041.1587
CI 0.332 [0.158]b
RI 0.607 [0.484]b
Phylogenetic conclusions d
Chrysomelidae M (sister to Orsodacnidae) M (sister to Cerambycidae)
‘sagrines’ (Don+Cri+Bru) M M (incl. Syn)
‘chrysomelines’+‘eumolpines’ M M
‘eumolpines’ (Spi+Eum+Cry+Cas) M (incl. Syn) M
Cassidinae s.l./s.str.e M/M M/Po
‘chrysomelines’ (Tim+Chr+Gal) M M
Tim+Chr Pa Pa
monocot feeding Chrysomelidae Po Po
a

Excluding gapped sites in brackets.

b

Optimized under parsimony in PAUP*, for comparative purposes only.

c

Optimized with PAUP* implementing the GTR+I+G model, for comparative purposes only.

d

M: monophyletic; Pa: paraphyletic; Po: polyphyletic.

e

The Cassidinae s.l. includes hispines (paraphyletic in our analyses) and cassidines.

Subfamily abbreviations: Don-Donaciinae, Cri-Criocerinae, Bru-Bruchinae, Syn-Synetinae, Spi-Spilopyrinae, Eum-Eumolpinae, Cry-Cryptocephalinae, Cas-Cassidinae, Tim-Timarchinae, Chr-Chrysomelinae, Gal-Galerucinae.