Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 1;56(527):444–449.

Table 2.

Patients for whom quality of life had improved, been maintained or deteriorated at the end of treatment (T5), follow-up 1 and follow-up 2.a

Group

AQLQ mean score Spiritual healing Sham healing Control
Improvement change ≥0.5
 End of treatment 42.0 (10) 43.0 (12) 28.6 (8)
 Follow up 1 41.0 (9) 61.0 (14) 40.9 (9)
 Follow up 2 38.0 (8) 32.0 (9) 34.6 (9)

Maintenance change > −0.5 to <0.5
 End of treatment 50.0 (12) 50.0 (14) 60.7 (17)
 Follow up 1 50.0 (11) 26.0 (6) 40.9 (9)
 Follow up 2 38 (8) 54.0 (15) 46.2 (12)

Deterioration change ≥ −0.5
 End of treatment 8.0 (2) 7.0 (2) 10.7 (3)
 Follow up 1 9.0 (2) 13.0 (3) 18.2 (4)
 Follow up 2 24.0 (5) 14.0 (4) 19.2 (5)

Missing data
 End of treatment 11.0 (3) 6.0 (2) 9.7 (3)
 Follow-up 1 19 (5) 23 (7) 29.0 (9)
 Follow-up 2 22 (6) 7.0 (2) 16.1 (5)

Net improversb
 End of treatment 34.0 36.0 17.9
 Follow-up 1 32.0 48.0 22.7
 Follow-up 2 14.0 18.0 15.4
a

Data are presented as %. Analysis used the mean changes from baseline two.

b

% showing improvement minus % showing deterioration. AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.