Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct 19;95(3):1783–1791. doi: 10.1152/jn.00878.2005

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

A: effect of vibratory adaptation at 60 and 250 Hz on OD. The 60-Hz adaptor produces a significant improvement in performance at the high frequencies while having little effect at the low frequencies. The 250-Hz adaptor produces a similar but nonsignificant effect. These results suggest that the RA signal interferes with the spatially modulated signal conveyed by SA1 fibers. B: effect of vibratory adaptation at 5 Hz on OD. The effect of the 5-Hz adaptor is almost identical to that of the 60-Hz adaptor, suggesting that the improvement in OD after vibratory adaptation is due to the effect of the adaptor on RA rather than PC fibers.