TABLE 2.
U estimate (95% C.I.) | s estimate (95% C.I.) | Fitness trait | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
5.5 × 10−5a | 0.217a | Growth rate via competition experiments | Zeyl and DeVisser (2001) |
(3.5 × 10−5–1.5 × 10−4)a | (0.208–0.236)a | ||
1.2 × 10−4b | 0.061b | Maximum growth rate via sliding-window program | Joseph and Hall (2004) |
(4.6 × 10−5–∞)b | (0–0.077)b | ||
1.3 × 10−2c | 0.0046c | Sporulation rate via the proportion of asci | This study |
(4.8 × 10−3–3.2 × 10−2)d | (0.0019–0.020)d | ||
(8 × 10−5–∞)c | (0–0.50)c | ||
3 × 10−4c | 0.017c | Maximum growth rate via sliding-window program | This study |
(6 × 10−5–1.1 × 10−3)e | (0.006–0.033)e | ||
(6 × 10−5–∞)c | (0–0.033)c |
These estimates have not been corrected for selection during colony growth; see Zeyl and DeVisser (2001) and Joseph and Hall (2004) for corrections.
Estimated with β = 60, which yielded the ML fit.
Estimated with β and P allowed to vary; includes petite mutations.
Estimated with β and P allowed to vary.
Estimated with β = 0.01 and P = 0, which yielded the ML fit.
Estimated with β = ∞ and P = 0, which yielded the ML fit.