Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar;175(3):1251–1266. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.063305

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of UPGMA using site-by-site and gene-by-gene bootstrapping, BURST, and our method on simulated data

Parameters
UPGMAa
UPGMAb
BURST
Our program
Simulation no. θ/L (×100) ρ Efficiency Accuracy Efficiency Accuracy Efficiency Accuracy Efficiency Accuracy
1 0.2 0 0.16 0.94 0.19 0.90 0.11 0.83 0.17 0.95
2 1.0 0 0.42 0.91 0.44 0.91 0.20 0.84 0.42 0.94
3 5.0 0 0.57 0.85 0.57 0.82 0.15 0.86 0.75 0.94
4 0.2 1 0.14 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.11 0.84 0.19 0.94
5 1.0 1 0.37 0.86 0.38 0.84 0.19 0.82 0.43 0.95
6 5.0 1 0.65 0.85 0.67 0.87 0.15 0.85 0.73 0.93
7 0.2 5 0.14 0.87 0.15 0.88 0.12 0.86 0.19 0.86
8 1.0 5 0.35 0.79 0.38 0.76 0.18 0.80 0.40 0.86
9 5.0 5 0.57 0.74 0.58 0.77 0.14 0.88 0.70 0.90
10 0.2 10 0.21 0.67 0.17 0.85 0.14 0.80 0.19 0.81
11 1.0 10 0.33 0.66 0.34 0.73 0.18 0.80 0.39 0.84
12 5.0 10 0.70 0.85 0.70 0.87 0.16 0.91 0.71 0.89
a

Site-by-site bootstrapping.

b

Gene-by-gene bootstrapping.