TABLE 1.

Genetic variation of microsatellite loci for 13 populations of D. ananassae

	Mean n	Mean He	Variance in repeat unit	Average no. of alleles	Average minimum repeat units	Mean repeat units	Average maximum repeat units	Mean D′		% D′ significant P < 0.05 subgroups
Population																	Total	1	2
Kathmandu	16.87	0.61	14.17	4.65	5.70	10.77	17.04	0.74	21.0	2.5a	0.65b
Mandalay	6.86	0.42	10.73	2.30	6.26	10.05	11.70	0.71	15.0	—	—
Bhubaneshwar	7.61	0.55	3.88	3.17	8.17	10.19	12.17	0.82	0.58	—	—
Puri	17.87	0.58	7.83	4.86	7.28	10.67	14.63	0.67	1.6	—	—
Hyderabad	13.74	0.59	5.85	4.52	7.04	10.55	13.99	0.76	6.2	—	—
Chennai	19.48	0.61	8.43	4.96	6.13	10.51	15.78	0.59	5.15	—	—
Colombo	6.0	0.47	9.97	2.56	7.56	10.71	12.71	0.91	0.65	—	—
Bogor	25.91	0.62	10.53	6.82	5.82	11.60	16.73	0.69	3.5	—	—
Darwin	8.96	0.52	8.95	3.17	8.61	10.96	14.63	0.82	0.28	—	—
Thursday Island	40.95	0.61	4.19	6.30	6.19	10.36	13.43	0.58	51.5	18.8c	3.9d
Trinity Beach	47.83	0.60	4.13	6.52	6.19	10.48	13.47	0.61	44.7	4.7c	11.2e
Apia	37.82	0.57	4.81	6.30	6.15	9.80	13.82	0.60	10.2	8.9f	—
Malololelei	20.95	0.51	4.15	4.81	7.33	11.29	13.52	0.73	4.2	—	—

“Mean n,” average number of chromosomes sampled; “Mean H_e,” expected heterozygosity; Mean D′, average LD for all pairwise comparisons of loci; “% LD significant P < 0.05,” percentage of pairwise comparisons between loci with probability of <5% on the basis of an unbiased estimate of the exact P-value of a contingency table using the permutation test of Raymond and Rousset (1995).

^aBlue subgroup, D′ = 0.78 (Figure 3).

^bLavender subgroup, D′ = 0.81 (Figure 3).

^cRed subgroup, D′ = 0.60 (Figure 3).

^dTan subgroup, D′ = 0.66 (Figure 3).

^eTan subgroup; D′ = 0.69 (Figure 3).

^fLight blue subgroup, D′ = 0.59 (Figure3).