Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Nov 18;1768(2):324–335. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.11.009

Table 2.

Ratio of [γ -32P]-8N3ATP/[α -32P]-8N3ATP labeling at NBD1 or NBD2

Samples
N-half C-half Ratioa at NBD1 Ratio at NBD2
Wild-type Wild-type 2.12 ± 0.26b 0.70 ± 0.14
H827L Wild-type 1.92 ± 0.45 0.90 ± 0.02
Wild-type H1486L 1.89 ± 0.34 1.26 ± 0.12
H827L H1486L 2.12 ± 0.32 1.38 ± 0.33
H827F Wild-type 2.17 ± 0.15 0.93 ± 0.02
Wild-type H1486F 2.15 ± 0.10 1.42 ± 0.14
H827F H1486F 1.98 ± 0.20 1.42 ± 0.19
a

The ratio (n = 4) of [γ -32P]-8-N3ATP/[α -32P]- 8-N3ATP labeling at NBD1 or NBD2 was derived from Figure 3. The amount of 32P-8-N3ATP incorporated into the N-half (NBD1) or C-half (NBD2) fragment was measured by employing Packard Instant Imager. The ratio of [γ -32P]-8-N3ATP/[α -32P]-8-N3ATP labeling at NBD1 or NBD2 was calculated by dividing the amount of [γ -32P]- 8-N3ATP labeling with that of [α -32P]-8-N3ATP labeling.

b

Statistical analysis indicated that the ratio values of NBD1 from all the mutants are not significantly different from that of wild-type NBD1 (2.12). The ratio values of NBD2 from H827L and H827F are also not significantly different from that of wild-type NBD2. In contrast, the ratio values of NBD2 from H1486L, H827L/H1486L, H1486F and H827F/H1486F are significantly different from that of wild-type NBD2 (0.70).