Skip to main content
. 2002 May;160(5):1589–1595. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61106-6

Table 2.

Discrepancies between FISH and GOLDFISH

GOLDFISH (Preview) GOLDFISH (Rereview) Initial direct FISH HER/ 17 ratio Dig FISH Repeat direct FISH Repeat HER/17 ratio mRNA HercepTest CB11 Resolution
Not amplified Not amplified 4.9 1.3 2.9 2.0 0.6 Negative 3+ 0 FISH pseudoamplification*
Not amplified Not amplified 4.3 1.7 5.7 3.6 1.3 Negative 3+ 2+ FISH pseudoamplification*
Low-level amplified Local low-level amplification 2.1 1.1 1.7 2.2 1.0 Negative 0 0 Most of tissue on GOLDFISH not amplified. Rare focal areas demonstrated background and low level positive GOLDFISH staining.
Low-level amplified Amplified 16.7 14.0 13.2 See Resolution See Resolution Negative 3+ 3+ GOLDFISH interpreted as focally positive on rereview and again on repeat staining. Repeat direct FISH demonstrated one small area with HER-2/neu amplification and only one chromosome 17 signal per nucleus.
Not amplified Not amplified 4.8 3.3 3.9 9.3 4.2 Negative 2+ 2+ Unresolved
Low-level amplified Low-level amplified 3.5 1.6 4.0 3.4 1.2 Negative 2+ 0 Unresolved

*FISH pseudoamplification was defined as the presence of apparent low-level HER-2/neu gene amplification attributable to a polysomic state of chromosome 17, based on the results of the reference direct dual-color FISH reference standard. In such cases, the HER-2/neu gene copy number was >4, but <8 (usually between 4.1 and 5.0) and multiple copies of chromosome 17 were present, each with a nonamplified HER-2/neu gene at locus 17q11.2-q12, resulting in a HER-2/chromosome 17 ratio < 2.0.