Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2007 Apr;143(4):1705–1719. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.092015

A Novel Major Facilitator Superfamily Protein at the Tonoplast Influences Zinc Tolerance and Accumulation in Arabidopsis1,[C],[W],[OA]

Michael J Haydon 1, Christopher S Cobbett 1,*
PMCID: PMC1851824  PMID: 17277087

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) is an essential micronutrient required by all cells but is toxic in excess. We have identified three allelic Zn-sensitive mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The gene, designated ZINC-INDUCED FACILITATOR1 (ZIF1), encodes a member of the major facilitator superfamily of membrane proteins, which are found in all organisms and transport a wide range of small, organic molecules. Shoots of zif1 mutants showed increased accumulation of Zn but not other metal ions. In combination with mutations affecting shoot-to-root Zn translocation, zif1 hma2 hma4 triple mutants accumulated less Zn than the wild type but remained Zn sensitive, suggesting that the zif1 Zn-sensitive phenotype is due to altered Zn distribution. zif1 mutants were also more sensitive to cadmium but less sensitive to nickel. ZIF1 promoter-β-glucuronidase fusions were expressed throughout the plant, with strongest expression in young tissues, and predominantly in the vasculature in older tissues. ZIF1 expression was highly induced by Zn and, to a lesser extent, by manganese. A ZIF1-green fluorescent protein fusion protein localized to the tonoplast in transgenic plants. MTP1 has been identified as a tonoplast Zn transporter and a zif1-1 mtp1-1 double mutant was more sensitive to Zn than either of the single mutants, suggesting ZIF1 influences a distinct mechanism of Zn homeostasis. Overexpression of ZIF1 conferred increased Zn tolerance and interveinal leaf chlorosis in some transgenic lines in which ZIF1 expression was high. We propose that ZIF1 is involved in a novel mechanism of Zn sequestration, possibly by transport of a Zn ligand or a Zn ligand complex into vacuoles.


Zinc (Zn) is an essential micronutrient that, in eukaryotes, fulfills a structural role in over 300 enzymes (Vallee and Auld, 1990) and in many Zn-finger proteins involved in signaling and transcriptional regulation (Berg and Shi, 1996). In excess, Zn is also toxic to cells, presumably due to competition with other biologically important ions, which in plants ultimately leads to reduced biomass, leaf chlorosis, and root inhibition. Plants have mechanisms for Zn homeostasis and are able to respond to excess Zn through Zn tolerance mechanisms, including exclusion from the root or, within the plant, transport into specific tissues, cellular or subcellular compartments, or sequestration by Zn-binding ligands (Clemens, 2001). The role of membrane transporters is central to Zn homeostasis, being required for uptake, compartmentalization, vascular loading, and delivery into organelles for utilization, and a number of protein families have been implicated in Zn transport in plants.

The first Zn transporters identified in plants were the Zrt-, Irt-like proteins (ZIPs) from Arabidopsis by functional complementation of a Zn uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strain (Grotz et al., 1998). ZIP1 and ZIP3 were shown to be induced in roots of Zn-starved seedlings, and ZIP4 was highly expressed in shoots and roots of Zn-deficient plants. Microarray analysis of Arabidopsis has demonstrated that a number of genes encoding ZIP proteins are induced in plants grown under Zn-deficient conditions (Wintz et al., 2003). Plant ZIP proteins that mediate uptake of Zn into yeast have also been identified in rice (Oryza sativa), soybean (Glycine max), Medicago truncatula, and the Zn-cadmium (Cd) hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens (Pence et al., 2000; Moreau et al., 2002; Lopez-Millan et al., 2004; Ishimaru et al., 2005). There are 18 genes predicted to encode ZIPs in Arabidopsis (Gaither and Eide, 2001) and, although the physiological functions of Zn-transporting ZIPs are yet to be described in plants, they are predicted to be involved in cellular uptake, including across the root plasma membrane, and in mobilization of stored Zn.

The P-type ATPases are a superfamily of ATP-driven ion transporters that have been divided into subfamilies based on sequence similarity and substrate specificity (Axelsen and Palmgren, 2001). The type 1B subfamily of P-type ATPases transport heavy metal ions and sequence comparisons can divide these into two distinct classes that reflect the substrate specificity for monovalent cations, such as Cu+ or Ag+, or divalent cations, such as Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, or Co2+ (Cobbett et al., 2003). There are eight type 1B P-type ATPases in Arabidopsis thaliana and three, HMA2, HMA3, and HMA4, transport Zn2+ or Cd2+ when expressed in Escherichia coli or yeast (Mills et al., 2003; Eren and Arguello, 2004; Gravot et al., 2004; Verret et al., 2005). HMA2 and HMA4 are expressed in vascular tissues of roots, leaves, and flowers and protein-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions localize to the plasma membrane (Hussain et al., 2004; Verret et al., 2004). Analysis of T-DNA mutants demonstrated that, although neither single mutant presented an obvious phenotype, hma2 hma4 double mutants exhibited leaf chlorosis, were stunted and infertile, and accumulated low levels of Zn in shoots despite elevated Zn content in roots (Hussain et al., 2004). The phenotype could be rescued by supplementation with Zn, suggesting that these mutants were Zn deficient due to impaired root-to-shoot translocation of Zn. Overexpression of HMA4 in Arabidopsis can increase transport of Zn to aerial tissues (Verret et al., 2004), and it has been proposed that HMA2 and HMA4 function, at least partially redundantly, in loading and/or unloading of Zn in vascular tissues for long-distance transport. The function of HMA3 in planta is not yet understood. Expression in yeast conferred Cd tolerance, despite similar Cd concentration to controls, implying a role in subcellular sequestration consistent with HMA3-GFP localization to vacuoles in yeast (Gravot et al., 2004). Localization of HMA3 in A. thaliana is not known but expression is normally low (Becher et al., 2004), and, in the Columbia (Col) ecotype, HMA3 contains a frameshift mutation that would lead to a truncated protein and is presumed to be nonfunctional (Cobbett et al., 2003). Orthologs of the Zn-transporting P-type ATPases have been identified in the Zn-Cd hyperaccumulators T. caerulescens and Arabidopsis halleri. TcHMA4 was identified from a cDNA library screen in yeast for Cd tolerance and can transport Zn, Cd, and lead (Pb) out of yeast cells (Papoyan and Kochian, 2004). AhHMA3 and AhHMA4 have been identified as transcripts expressed at elevated levels in A. halleri compared to A. thaliana, and both confer Zn tolerance when expressed in yeast (Becher et al., 2004, Talke et al., 2006). In addition, there are eight type 1B P-type ATPases in the rice genome (Baxter et al., 2003). Based on protein sequence comparisons, only two, OsHMA2 and OsHMA3, are predicted to transport Zn.

Cation diffusion facilitators (CDFs) have been described in Arabidopsis that contribute to Zn tolerance by vacuolar Zn sequestration. MTP1 (formerly ZAT1) is expressed constitutively in both roots and shoots and confers a moderate increase in Zn tolerance when overexpressed (van der Zaal et al., 1999). MTP1 transports Zn in proteoliposomes and Xenopus oocytes (Bloss et al., 2002; Desbrosses-Fonrouge et al., 2005), and GFP fusions and western blots using membrane fractions show MTP1 is in the tonoplast in A. thaliana (Kobae et al., 2004; Desbrosses-Fonrouge et al., 2005). Mutation or RNAi-mediated knockdown of AtMTP1 confers increased sensitivity to excess Zn, indicating that MTP1 is likely to play a key role in Zn tolerance (Kobae et al., 2004; Desbrosses-Fonrouge et al., 2005). More recently, AtMTP3 has been identified as a second tonoplast-localized CDF that also confers moderate Zn tolerance when overexpressed and increased Zn sensitivity in RNAi lines (Arrivault et al., 2006). Unlike MTP1, MTP3 is predominantly expressed in roots and is induced by high Zn, manganese (Mn), and cobalt (Co), as well as iron (Fe) deficiency. It was suggested that MTP3 is important for sequestration of Zn in root vacuoles under elevated Zn, as well as Fe deficiency (Arrivault et al., 2006). In leaves of both A. halleri and T. caerulescens, genes encoding CDF transporters are more highly expressed than in nonaccumulator species (Becher et al., 2004; Hammond et al., 2006). AhMTP1 localized to the tonoplast in A. thaliana protoplasts and Zn tolerance and elevated MTP1 transcript cosegregated with duplicated copies of MTP1 in backcrossed populations, indicating an important role for MTP1 in Zn tolerance in the hyperaccumulator A. halleri (Drager et al., 2004).

An additional transporter has been identified in plants that can transport Zn. AtMHX was cloned from Arabidopsis by PCR based on sequence similarity to a mammalian Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, but was shown to transport Mg2+ and Zn2+ by proton antiport and localized to vacuoles (Shaul et al., 1999). The importance of this transporter for Zn homeostasis in A. thaliana is not clear, although expression of MHX in A. halleri is elevated compared to A. thaliana and may be important for Zn tolerance in this species (Elbaz et al., 2006).

In this study, a Zn-sensitive mutant, zinc-induced facilitator1 (zif1), has been identified. ZIF1 encodes a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter with low similarity to any previously characterized protein. ZIF1, like MTP1, MTP3, and MHX, is localized to the tonoplast and identifies a novel component of Zn homeostasis in plants.

RESULTS

Mutations Affecting a MFS Protein Confer Zn Sensitivity

A Zn-sensitive T-DNA insertion mutant, designated zif1-1, was identified in the Wassilewskija (Ws) ecotype of A. thaliana in the process of identifying mutants for a previous study (Hussain et al., 2004). Inverse PCR revealed the T-DNA to be in a gene (At5g13740) encoding an MFS protein. The mutant was backcrossed to Ws and, from an F2 population that segregated for kanamycin resistance in a 3:1 ratio, 24 unselected F3 populations were genotyped for the T-DNA insertion by PCR and scored for kanamycin resistance and the Zn-sensitive phenotype. Cosegregation of the T-DNA, kanamycin resistance, and Zn sensitivity were observed in all populations and were consistent with a single T-DNA insertion site. A second T-DNA allele, zif1-2, was obtained in the Col ecotype from the SALK collection (SALK_011408) and an individual homozygous for the T-DNA insertion was backcrossed to Col. In the F2 progeny, Zn sensitivity segregated in a Mendelian ratio, although kanamycin resistance was too weak to score. In addition, we conducted a screen of ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized Col M2 seed to identify additional mutants with a Zn-sensitive phenotype similar to that of zif1-1. One mutant, zif1-3, failed to complement zif1-2 in both F1 and F2 individuals, and nucleotide sequencing of the entire coding region of ZIF1 in zif1-3 individuals revealed a single base pair change resulting in a G472R substitution in the predicted 12th transmembrane domain (TMD). Backcrossed, homozygous populations of the three mutants were used for all experiments.

The locations of the mutations in zif1 mutants are summarized in Figure 1A. Because the T-DNA is inserted into an intron in both zif1-1 and zif1-2, it was important to test whether these are true knockout mutants. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using primers that flank the T-DNA insertion sites showed that no wild-type transcript could be detected in zif1-1, whereas a decreased level of truncated transcript (approximately 25%) was detected by amplifying a region upstream of the insertion site (Fig. 1B). In contrast, low levels of wild-type transcript could be amplified from zif1-2 seedlings (Fig. 1B) using either primers flanking the insertion site or primers specific for a downstream region. The identity of the product was confirmed by digestion at a predicted restriction site (data not shown). Using the primers for the downstream region, the level of wild-type transcript in zif1-2 was estimated as approximately 6% of that in Col (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Molecular analysis of T-DNA knockouts. A, Schematic representation of ZIF1 showing approximate locations of exons (gray boxes), introns (black lines), and translational initiation and termination codons (arrowheads) constructed from information available from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR; www.arabidopsis.org). The experimentally determined locations of the T-DNA insertions in zif1-1 and zif1-2 and the single base pair substitution in zif1-3 are indicated. Two primer pairs were designed to flank the T-DNA in zif1-1 (A + B) and zif1-2 (C + D). B, RT-PCR of Ws, zif1-1 (1-1), Col, and zif1-2 (1-2) using A + B primers (24 cycles), C + D primers (26 cycles), or ACT2 primers (18 cycles). Gels were stained with SYBR Green I. Numbers represent percent abundance relative to ACT2 determined using ImageQuant software.

The three zif1 mutants showed similar levels of sensitivity to Zn compared to the wild type (Fig. 2A). The sensitivity is characterized by increased chlorosis and decreased shoot fresh weight and root length compared to the corresponding wild-type controls. When grown on medium containing 60 μm Zn, zif1-1, zif1-2, and zif1-3 had 51%, 55%, and 39%, respectively, of the shoot fresh weight of the wild type (Fig. 2B). Similarly, on 100 μm Zn, the root length of zif1 mutants was 30% to 36% of that on control medium, whereas the wild types were unaffected (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Zn sensitivity of zif1 alleles. A, Seventeen-day-old Col, zif1-1, zif1-2, and zif1-3 plants growing vertically on MM or MM containing 100 μm ZnSO4. B, Shoot fresh weight. C, Root length. Seven-day-old plants were transferred from MM to MM containing the indicated metal concentration and grown vertically for a further 10 d as described in “Materials and Methods.” Values are mean ± se (n = 8). Statistical differences from Col were determined by t test (*, P < 0.05). [See online article for color version of this figure.]

The sensitivity of zif1 mutants to other metals was also tested. The three mutants showed increased sensitivity to Cd, with increased chlorosis (Fig. 3A) and decreased shoot and root fresh weight (Fig. 3, B and C), although root length was not inhibited at the concentrations of Cd used (data not shown). On medium containing inhibitory levels of nickel (Ni), mutant plants appeared to have decreased sensitivity (Fig. 3D), evident in increased shoot fresh weight (Fig. 3E) and decreased root inhibition (Fig. 3F). No significant differences in shoot fresh weight, root length, or leaf chlorosis were observed between zif1 mutants and wild-type plants when grown on a range of inhibitory concentrations of Cu, Co, Mn, or Fe (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Cd sensitivity and Ni tolerance of zif1 alleles. A, Seventeen-day-old Col, zif1-1, zif1-2, and zif1-3 plants growing vertically on MM or MM containing 3 μm CdSO4 or 80 μm NiCl2. B and D, Shoot fresh weight. C and E, Root length. Seven-day-old plants were transferred from MM to MM containing the indicated metal concentration and grown vertically for a further 10 d. Values are mean ± se (n = 8). Statistical differences from Col were determined by t test (*, P < 0.05). [See online article for color version of this figure.]

MFS proteins have been identified in all organisms from bacteria to mammals. They contain either 12 or 14 TMDs, with a large, cytoplasmic loop between TMD6 and TMD7, and a conserved MFS-specific motif between TMD2 and TMD3. Substrates are typically small, organic molecules, such as sugars, amino acids, and organic acids, and transport occurs via symport, antiport, or uniport (Pao et al., 1998). Of the MFS members that have been characterized, ZIF1 is most similar to the drug-H+ antiporters from bacteria, although the amino acid sequence similarity is less than 40%. There are more than 90 genes in A. thaliana that code for putative MFS proteins (Ren and Paulsen, 2005), and the limited number of these that have been characterized transport sugars (Sauer and Stolz, 1994; Stolz et al., 1994), phosphate (Muchhal et al., 1996; Smith et al., 1997), or nitrate (Tsay et al., 1993). There are putative ZIF1 orthologs, based on high amino acid sequence similarity, in other plant species. Two, which share 67% sequence similarity with ZIF1, have been identified in maize (Zea mays; Simmons et al., 2003). There are at least five orthologs in the rice genome that are between 60% and 70% similar, and one orthologous sequence, which shares 73% protein sequence similarity with ZIF1, has been identified in red clover (Trifolium pratense). Although the function of these is unknown, they, along with ZIF1, are predicted to contain 12 TMD and possess the MFS signature sequence and conserved motifs believed to be important for proton-substrate antiport (Simmons et al., 2003).

In the Arabidopsis genome, there are two ZIF1 paralogs that we have designated ZIF-LIKE1 (ZIFL1; At5g13750) and ZIFL2 (At3g43790). ZIFL1 and ZIFL2 share 80% and 75% amino acid sequence similarity with ZIF1, respectively. To investigate the role of these genes in Zn tolerance, T-DNA mutants were obtained from the SALK collection: SALK_030680 (zifl1-1) and SALK_059042 (zifl2-1). Homozygous individuals were identified by PCR and backcrossed to the wild type. F2 populations were scored for kanamycin resistance and homozygous mutant individuals were identified from populations that showed 3:1 segregation of the marker. Using RT-PCR, no wild-type transcript could be detected from each gene in the corresponding mutant (data not shown). To address the possibility of functional redundancy, zif1-2 zifl2-1 and zif1-1 zifl2-1 double mutants were generated. ZIF1 and ZIFL1 are tandem genes so the double mutant could not be generated. The single and double mutants were tested for sensitivity to Zn. With respect to leaf chlorosis and fresh weight, the single mutants, zifl1-1 and zifl2-1, and the zifl1-1 zifl2-1 double mutant were not different from the wild type, and the zif1-2 zifl2-1 mutant was not different from zif1-2 (data not shown). This suggests that, at least at the whole-plant level, these mutations do not contribute to a Zn sensitivity phenotype.

zif1 Mutants Accumulate Elevated Levels of Zn

To investigate whether the Zn-sensitive phenotype of zif1 mutants is associated with increased accumulation of Zn, the shoot metal content of Ws wild-type and zif1-1 plants was determined using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). When plants were grown on mineral salts medium (MM) from which Zn had been omitted, there was no difference in shoot Zn content in zif1-1 compared to the wild type (Fig. 4A). However, when grown on MM containing 10 μm ZnSO4, zif1-1 shoots contained 32% more Zn than Ws (Fig. 4B). A significant increase in shoot Fe content was also observed in zif1-1 plants compared to Ws when grown on MM without Zn, but there was no difference between shoot Fe content of Ws and zif1-1 plants when grown on MM with 10 μm Zn (Fig. 4, A and B). No significant differences in shoot content of Mn, copper (Cu; Fig. 4, A and B), magnesium (Mg), or calcium (Ca; data not shown) between zif1-1 and Ws plants grown on either medium were detected.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Metal accumulation in zif1 mutants. A and B, Shoot metal content of Ws and zif1-1 plants grown on MM without Zn (A) or MM containing 10 μm ZnSO4 (B). Seven-day-old plants were transferred onto the indicated medium and grown for a further 14 d. Values are mean ± se, and each replicate represents pooled shoots from five seedlings (n = 8). C, Shoot Zn content of Col and zif1-2 plants grown on MM or MM containing 30 or 60 μm ZnSO4 as described in Figure 2. Values are mean ± se, and each replicate represents a pool of shoots from three or four seedlings (n = 4). D, Shoot Zn content of Ws and zif1-1 seedlings grown on MM or MM with 30 or 60 μm ZnSO4 as described in Figure 2. Values are mean ± se, and each replicate represents a pool of shoots from five seedlings (n = 4). Statistical differences from wild types in A, B, C, and D were determined by t test (*, P < 0.05). Pooled tissues were collected from seedlings grown on a single plate and replicates represent separate plates.

To confirm these observations, the metal content in shoots and roots of Col wild-type and zif1-2 seedlings grown on MM, which contains 1 μm Zn, or MM with 30 or 60 μm Zn added was determined. There was no significant difference between shoot Zn content of Col and zif1-2 plants when grown on MM (Fig. 4C), but moderate increases in shoot Zn content of 13% and 41% were detected in zif1-2 seedlings grown on medium containing 30 or 60 μm Zn, respectively, compared to the wild type. In a separate experiment, shoot Zn content was also significantly increased in zif1-1 seedlings compared to Ws wild type when grown on medium containing 30 or 60 μm Zn by 23% and 47%, respectively, but was not significantly different when grown on MM (Fig. 4D). Similarly, root Zn content of zif1-2 was not different from Col when grown on MM, but was significantly higher in zif1-2 plants grown on 30 or 60 μm Zn by 36% and 88%, respectively (data not shown). No significant differences in Mn content of Col and zif1-2 were observed in roots or shoots of seedlings grown on MM or medium containing 30 μm Zn. However, in plants grown on medium containing 60 μm Zn, Mn content was 89% and 48% higher in zif1-2 shoots and roots, respectively, compared to wild type (data not shown). No significant differences in Fe, Cu, Mg, Ca, or potassium (K) content in roots or shoots were observed between zif1-2 and Col plants when grown on MM or MM containing 30 or 60 μm Zn (data not shown). The metal content of zifl1-1 and zifl2-1 plants grown on MM or MM with 30 or 60 μm Zn were also determined, but no significant differences compared to the wild type were observed (data not shown).

zif1 Also Confers Zn Sensitivity in a Low-Zn Mutant Background

HMA2 and HMA4 encode Zn-transporting P-type ATPases that are important for translocation of Zn from roots to shoots (Hussain et al., 2004). hma2 hma4 double mutants show severe Zn deficiency when grown under routine conditions in soil and have decreased shoot, but increased root, Zn content (Hussain et al., 2004). A zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 triple mutant was identified and, when grown in soil, showed an increase in shoot fresh weight compared to the hma2-2 hma4-1 double mutant (Fig. 5, A and B), which corresponded with increased shoot Zn content of zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 compared to hma2-2 hma4-1 (Fig. 5C). The levels of other metals were not significantly increased in the triple mutant compared with the hma2 hma4 double mutant (data not shown).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Suppression of Zn deficiency and Zn sensitivity of zif1 hma2 hma4. A, Forty-two-day-old hma2-2 ham4-1 (left) and zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 plants grown in soil irrigated with water. B, Shoot fresh weight of plants shown in A (mean ± se, n = 8). C, The shoot Zn content of 42-d-old hma2-2 hma4-1 and zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 grown irrigated with water (left) or 1 mm ZnSO4 (right). Each replicate is of two pooled plants (mean ± se, n = 8). D, Seventeen-day-old Ws, zif1-1, hma2-2 hma4-1, and zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 plants growing on MM containing 100 or 140 μm ZnSO4. E, Shoot fresh weight of plants grown as described in Figure 2 (mean ± se, n = 8). F, Shoot Zn content of plants grown as described in Figure 2 on MM with 30 or 90 μm ZnSO4. Each replicate is a pool of five seedlings (mean ± se, n = 4). Significant differences from Ws in B and C were determined by t test (*, P < 0.05). For multiple, pairwise comparisons in E and F, significant differences between genotypes were determined for each treatment by ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference tests. Different letters represent significantly different means within each treatment (P < 0.05). Pooled tissues were collected from seedlings grown on a single plate or pot and replicates represent separate plates or pots. [See online article for color version of this figure.]

Because the hma2-2 hma4-1 mutants have greatly reduced shoot Zn content compared to wild type (Hussain et al., 2004), we reasoned that the triple mutant may be less sensitive to high levels of Zn compared to zif1-1 due to decreased shoot Zn accumulation. However, when seedlings were grown on inhibitory concentrations of Zn, the zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 mutants were indistinguishable from zif1-1 seedlings (Fig. 5, D and E) even though levels of Zn in shoots were significantly less than in the zif1-1 seedlings (Fig. 5F). The levels of other metals were not significantly increased in zif1-1 and zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 compared to wild type (data not shown). The increased Zn sensitivity of zif1 and zif1 hma2 hma4 seedlings may be due to an effect in roots. However, zif1 hma2 hma4 mutants are expected to have a higher concentration of Zn in roots than zif1 and so should be more Zn sensitive than the single mutant if the effect is isolated to roots. On the contrary, the shoot fresh weights of zif1-1 and zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 are not significantly different on any Zn concentration tested (Fig. 5E). Therefore, we suggest that the Zn sensitivity of zif1 mutants is likely to be caused by an incorrect distribution of Zn, rather than the overall increase in Zn content per se.

ZIF1 Shows a Broad Pattern of Expression and Is Induced in Shoots and Roots by Zn

To observe the tissue specificity of ZIF1 expression, a 1.9-kb fragment of the ZIF1 promoter region was fused to uidA (β-glucuronidase [GUS]) and transformed into Col wild-type plants. GUS expression was observed in both leaves and roots of seedlings (Fig. 6, A and B). In shoots, expression was strongest in developing leaves, whereas in older leaves expression was mostly associated with vascular tissues (Fig. 6A). A similar trend was observed in roots with strong expression in the differentiating zone of root tips, including lateral roots, but becoming restricted to vascular tissues of mature roots (Fig. 6, C and D). GUS expression was also observed in flowers, with strong expression in sepals of developing flowers, becoming confined to the sepal vasculature in mature flowers (Fig. 6, E and F), and in the vasculature of mature anthers and filaments (Fig. 6, F and G). Expression was not observed in developing anthers or anther filaments (data not shown).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Expression of ZIF1p-GUS in transgenic plants. A, Fourteen-day-old seedling. B, Detail of developing leaf of seedling shown in A. C, Roots tips. D, Lateral roots. E, Inflorescences. F, Mature flower. G, Mature flower with sepals and petals removed. Bars = 1 mm.

To investigate whether ZIF1 is regulated by metals, semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to measure ZIF1 expression in plants grown on medium supplemented with subinhibitory concentrations of Zn, Cd, Mn, Fe, and Cu. ZIF1 expression was higher in both roots and shoots of seedlings grown on medium containing 30 μm Zn or 250 μm Mn compared to seedlings grown on MM or MM with 1.5 μm Cd, 15 μm Cu, or 200 μm Fe (data not shown). To confirm the regulation of ZIF1 by Zn and Mn, quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used to measure ZIF1 expression in roots and shoots of seedlings grown on MM or MM with 30 μm Zn, 250 μm Mn, or 200 μm Fe. ZIF1 expression was approximately 2-fold higher in roots of seedlings grown on Zn compared to seedlings on MM (Fig. 7A). In shoots, ZIF1 was induced approximately 5-fold by Zn and 3-fold by Mn (Fig. 7B). Expression of ZIF1 in seedlings grown on Fe was not significantly different from control plants (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Regulation of ZIF1 by Zn. A and B, Relative expression of ZIF1 in roots (A) and shoots (B) of 14-d-old Col plants that had been exposed to MM or MM with 30 μm Zn, 250 μm Mn, or 200 μm Fe for 7 d. ZIF1 and ACT2 were amplified by real-time PCR, and expression of ZIF1 was calculated relative to ACT2 and normalized to mean expression in seedlings grown on MM using the ΔΔCt method. Values are means ± se (n = 3). Significant differences from control conditions (MM) were determined by t test (*, P < 0.05).

To investigate whether the concentration of Zn in growth medium affects spatial expression of ZIF1, GUS activity was observed in roots of ZIF1p-GUS seedlings grown on elevated Zn. In roots, GUS expression was higher in the vasculature of seedlings grown on Zn compared to seedlings grown on MM and expression was also observed in nonvascular cells (Fig. 8A). Cross-sections through the differentiated zone of roots demonstrated that, in plants grown on control medium, GUS activity was restricted to vascular and pericycle cells, whereas in the presence of 30 μm Zn, GUS activity in the vasculature and pericycle increased and was also observed in cortical cells. In the presence of the mildly inhibitory concentration of 60 μm Zn, very high GUS activity was observed in all root cells, including the epidermis (Fig. 8B). Increased ZIF1p-GUS expression was also observed in shoots of seedlings grown on subinhibitory concentrations of Zn. The apparent increase in expression in leaves of lines exposed to Zn was the result of persistence of expression throughout older leaves compared to the more limited, vascular expression in mature leaves of plants grown on control medium (Fig. 8C). Cross-sections through leaves showed a predominance of GUS expression in vascular cells and an absence of expression in epidermal cells in plants grown on control medium, whereas in plants grown in the presence of 30 μm Zn, GUS activity was stronger and more evenly distributed in all leaf cells (Fig. 8D).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Regulation of ZIF1p-GUS expression by Zn. A, GUS expression in root tips of lines exposed to MM (left) or 60 μm Zn for 5 d. B, Cross-section through mature roots zone of seedlings grown on MM (left), 30 μm (middle), or 60 μm Zn (right). C, Comparison of cotyledons and leaves from seedlings exposed to MM (top) or 30 μm Zn (bottom) for 5 d. D, Cross-section through the second true leaf of seedlings exposed to MM (left) or 30 μm Zn (right).

ZIF1 Is Localized to the Tonoplast

To determine the subcellular localization of ZIF1, a C-terminal GFP fusion was made by cloning the ZIF cDNA in frame with GFP under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and transformed into Col plants. In root tips of 35S-ZIF1-GFP lines, fluorescence localized to an internal membrane (Fig. 9A) compared to 35S-GFP controls, which fluoresced in the cytoplasm surrounding the vacuole and in nuclei (Fig. 9B). This is similar to the localization of ShMTP8-GFP (described as ShMTP1) at the tonoplast in Arabidopsis root tips (Delhaize et al., 2003; Fig. 9C). As root cells differentiated and became more highly vacuolated, the fluorescence of ZIF1-GFP began to fill the cell (Fig. 9D) and, in mature root cells, the fluorescence marked a membrane adjacent to the cell perimeter (Fig. 9E). This is consistent with ZIF1 localizing to the tonoplast of root cells. Protoplasts were also isolated from leaves of 35S-ZIF1-GFP and 35S-GFP lines. ZIF1-GFP localized to a membrane within the perimeter of the plasma membrane, made apparent by the location of the chloroplasts, which are external to the GFP-marked membrane (Fig. 9F). This is consistent with tonoplast localization of ZIF1-GFP, which is supported by 35S-GFP controls in which fluorescence fills the cytoplasm, marking the outline of the vacuole that occupies most of the cell (Fig. 9G).

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

ZIF1-GFP localizes to the tonoplast. A to G, GFP fluorescence in transgenic Arabidopsis. A, ZIF1-GFP in a root tip. B, 35S-GFP in a root tip. C, ShMTP1-GFP in a root tip. D, ZIF1-GFP in differentiating root epidermal cells. E, ZIF1-GFP in a mature epidermal root cell. F, ZIF1-GFP in protoplasts isolated from leaves of stable lines. G, 35S-GFP in protoplasts isolated from leaves of stable lines. Green fluorescence indicates GFP, and red fluorescence represents cell walls stained with propidium iodide in A to E or chloroplasts in F and G. Bars = 20 μm.

To confirm that ZIF1-GFP was correctly localized, 35S-ZIF1-GFP was also transformed into the zif1-2 mutant to test whether it could complement the Zn-sensitive phenotype. For comparison, a 35S-ZIF1 construct was also generated and transformed into zif1-2. Seven 35S-ZIF1 and five 35S-ZIF1-GFP independent transgenic lines were identified and two of each were selected for further analysis based on high transgene expression as determined by RT-PCR (data not shown). When tested for Zn sensitivity, these lines showed a phenotype similar to the wild type, whereas zif1-2 lines containing the empty vector remained Zn sensitive as expected (Fig. 10, A–C). Fluorescence in zif1-2-complemented lines also indicated tonoplast localization of ZIF1-GFP (data not shown). These results indicate that overexpression of ZIF1 or ZIF1-GFP complements zif1-2, suggesting that the ZIF1-GFP fusion is functional and correctly localized.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Complementation of zif1 by overexpression of ZIF1. A, Seventeen-day-old transgenic lines growing vertically on MM or MM with 120 or 180 μm ZnSO4. B, Shoot fresh weight. C, Root length of plants grown as described in Figure 2. Values are means ± se (n = 8). Significant differences from Col were determined by t test (*, P < 0.05). [See online article for color version of this figure.]

Overexpression of ZIF1 Can Confer Increased Zn Tolerance and Causes Interveinal Leaf Chlorosis

Of the four lines of zif1-2 overexpressing ZIF1 or ZIF-GFP, one showed significantly better shoot growth on medium containing 60 μm Zn, whereas a second also grew better on 120 μm Zn (Fig. 10). Of the four lines, these two had the highest levels of expression of the ZIF1 transgene (data not shown). This indicates that overexpression of ZIF1 from the 35S promoter can, in some circumstances, confer increased tolerance to Zn.

The 35S-ZIF1 and 35S-ZIF1-GFP constructs and a 35S-ZIF1-6×-His construct, which was also able to complement the Zn sensitivity of zif1-2 (data not shown), were also transformed into Col wild-type plants. Whereas none of seven independent homozygous T3 35S-ZIF1 lines showed ZIF1 expression greater than in Col (data not shown), three independent homozygous 35S-ZIF1-GFP lines and two independent homozygous 35S-ZIF1-His lines with high transgene expression (Fig. 11A) were identified. When these lines were grown in soil or on agar medium for 2 to 3 weeks, leaves became chlorotic between the leaf veins, and this phenotype was also observed in zif1-2 plants overexpressing ZIF1 (Fig. 11B).

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Interveinal chlorosis of 35S-ZIF1 transgenic lines. A, RT-PCR of Col, zif1-2, and transgenic lines expressing 35S-ZIF1, 35S-ZIF1-GFP, or 35S-ZIF1-His. ZIF1 (22 cycles) and ACT2 (18 cycles) were amplified from cDNA made from pooled, whole 10-d-old seedlings. Gels were stained with SYBR Green I. B, Twenty-one-day-old plants growing on MM. C, Shoot fresh weight of plants grown as described in Figure 2. Values are means ± se (n = 8). Statistical differences were determined compared to Col by t test (*, P < 0.05). [See online article for color version of this figure.]

Two lines for each construct were grown in the presence of inhibitory Zn concentrations. When tested for growth in the presence of 100 μm Zn, two of these lines showed better growth than the wild type, apparent in a significant increase in shoot fresh weight (Fig. 11C), further indicating that overexpression in some cases can confer increased Zn tolerance.

Increased Zn Sensitivity of a zif1 mtp1 Double Mutant

MTP1 is believed to be important for Zn tolerance in A. thaliana via transport of Zn into vacuoles. T-DNA mutations and RNAi knockdowns of MTP1 confer a Zn-sensitive phenotype (Kobae et al., 2004; Desbrosses-Fonrouge et al., 2005). To investigate possible genetic interactions between ZIF1 and MTP1, zif1-1 was crossed to mtp1-1 (Kobae et al., 2004) and a double mutant was identified from F2 progeny using PCR. Zn sensitivity of the double mutant was compared to Ws wild type and the single mutants (Fig. 12). The Zn sensitivity of mtp1-1 is less severe than that of zif1-1 (Fig. 12A). Shoot fresh weight (Fig. 12B) and root length (Fig. 12C) were decreased to a lesser extent in mtp1-1 than zif1-1, compared to Ws wild type, when grown on medium containing 60, 100, or 140 μm ZnSO4. Furthermore, Zn sensitivity of the zif1-1 mtp1-1 double mutant is more severe than zif1-1 (Fig. 12A). When grown on 60 μm Zn, significant root growth inhibition was observed in zif1-1 mtp1-1, whereas the root length of zif1-1 was not significantly different from Ws (Fig. 12C). In addition, the difference in root length between zif1-1 and zif1-1 mtp1-1 was also visible on 100 μm Zn (Fig. 12A). This observation implies that ZIF1 and MTP1 contribute to Zn tolerance in A. thaliana via independent mechanisms.

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Zn hypersensitivity of zif1 mtp1 double mutants. A, Seventeen-day-old Ws, zif1-1, mtp1-1, and zif1-1 mtp1-1 plants growing vertically on MM or MM containing 100 μm ZnSO4. B, Shoot fresh weight. C, Root length of plants grown as described in Figure 2. Values are mean ± se (n = 8). For multiple, pairwise comparisons, significant differences between genotypes were determined for each treatment by ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference tests. Different letters represent significantly different means within each treatment (P < 0.05). [See online article for color version of this figure.]

DISCUSSION

Three alleles of a novel Zn-sensitive mutant of A. thaliana have been identified. When grown on medium containing inhibitory concentrations of Zn, mutants showed as much as a 50% reduction in fresh weight compared to wild-type plants. Increased sensitivity to other essential metals was not observed, although they showed increased sensitivity and tolerance, respectively, for Cd and Ni, which are nonessential elements in Arabidopsis. In zif1 mutants, levels of Zn, but not of other metals, were consistently increased. This was observed in the zif1 mutants themselves and also in the effect of zif1 in the Zn-deficient hma2 hma4 background. ZIF1 was also strongly induced by subinhibitory concentrations of Zn and, to a lesser extent, Mn, but not other metals. Together, these observations suggest that the function of ZIF1 is relatively specific to Zn homeostasis.

Localization of a ZIF1-GFP fusion to the tonoplast suggests that ZIF1 may affect the distribution of Zn between the vacuole and the tonoplast. Because mutants are Zn sensitive, it seems likely that loss of ZIF1 leads to an accumulation of Zn in the cytosol. However, if Zn is accumulating in the cytosol of zif1, the overall increased Zn content per unit dry weight in these plants is difficult to explain. MTP1 and MTP3 in Arabidopsis are, like ZIF1, localized to the tonoplast and are believed to transport Zn into vacuoles. RNAi-mediated knockdown of MTP1 or MTP3 also confers Zn sensitivity (Desbrosses-Fonrouge et al., 2005; Arrivault et al., 2006). In contrast to the observations for zif1, MTP1 knockdown led to a decrease in Zn in leaves when grown in soil, although the Zn content of these lines when grown on higher Zn concentrations has not been reported. MTP3 knockdown lines had increased leaf Zn content when grown on soil or on medium containing 30 μm Zn, similar to zif1, and it was proposed that this was due to decreased sequestration of Zn in root vacuoles, although Zn content in roots of these lines was not reported. The increased shoot Zn content of zif1 may be due, at least in part, to decreased Zn sequestration in roots, and this may also explain the increased shoot Zn content of soil-grown zif1-1 hma2-2 hma4-1 compared to hma2-2 hma4-1. Notwithstanding that ZIF1 is expressed in most tissues in plants exposed to high levels of Zn, it is also possible that loss of ZIF1 function may lead to redistribution of Zn in shoot tissues.

The mtp1-1 T-DNA mutant is Zn sensitive (Kobae et al., 2004). The Zn-sensitive phenotype of zif1-1 mutants is more severe than mtp1-1 and a zif1-1 mtp1-1 double mutant is more Zn sensitive than zif1-1. This suggests that ZIF1 and MTP1 contribute to Zn tolerance via independent mechanisms. If ZIF1 and MTP1 function in the same pathway of vacuolar Zn sequestration, the double mutant would be expected to be as sensitive to Zn as the zif1 single mutant. Unlike the constitutively expressed MTP1 (van der Zaal et al., 1999), ZIF1 is highly induced in plants exposed to increased, but noninhibitory, Zn concentrations, suggesting ZIF1 may constitute an MTP1-independent, inducible pathway for vacuolar Zn sequestration. Indeed, GUS expression results indicating that ZIF1 is expressed in most cells in the plant under conditions of high Zn exposure imply an important role for ZIF1 in Zn tolerance in A. thaliana.

In view of the apparent role of ZIF1 in Zn tolerance and because most of the MFS proteins for which the substrate is known transport organic molecules, it is possible that ZIF1 transports a Zn ligand. Nicotianamine, phytochelatin, and His have been implicated as metal-binding ligands in plants (Callahan et al., 2006), but these are not likely to be important Zn-binding ligands in vacuoles. Organic acids, such as citrate and malate, have been implicated in Zn homeostasis as ligands in plant vacuoles and are therefore good candidates for the ZIF1 substrate. Computer modeling of the likely Zn ligands in vacuoles of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) suggested >90% should be bound to citrate (Wang et al., 1992). In T. caerulescens, x-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis indicated Zn citrate is the predominant species in shoots (Salt et al., 1999), whereas extended x-ray absorption spectroscopy in A. halleri suggested that malate is the most likely Zn ligand in leaves (Sarret et al., 2002). Some tonoplast citrate or malate transporters have been identified, but none is an MFS protein. AttDT in A. thaliana transports malate into vacuoles (Emmerlich et al., 2003) and a vacuolar citrate transporter, CsCit1, identified in navel orange (Citrus sinensis cv Washington) based on similarity to AttDT, transported citrate out of yeast tonoplast vesicles by proton symport (Shimada et al., 2006). A transporter that mediates uptake of citrate into plant vacuoles, which is believed to occur via citrate-H+ antiport (Oleski et al., 1987; Rentsch and Martinoia, 1991), is yet to be identified. Given that ZIF1 is most similar to MFS proteins that transport by substrate-H+ antiport and contains protein sequence motifs conserved among these members of the MFS, ZIF1 may fulfill this role in A. thaliana.

A second model is that ZIF1 transports a Zn chelate and functions in addition to a tonoplast carrier for the free ligand. This model has a precedent because, although MFS proteins are not known to transport metal ions, some transport metal-ligand complexes. The tetracycline resistance protein from E. coli, TetA(B), which is a member of the drug-H+ antiporter family, transports a divalent metal-tetracycline complex in exchange for protons (Yamaguchi et al., 1990, 1991), and the siderophore transporter family of MFS proteins is involved in uptake of Fe-siderophores in yeast and fungi (Heymann et al., 1999, 2000a, 2000b; Yun et al., 2000a, 2000b; Ardon et al., 2001; Haas et al., 2003). The indication that ZIF1 functions independently of MTP1 also supports a model in which the substrate is a Zn chelate, whereby a separate Zn2+ transporter is not required. However, it may be that ZIF1 function is dependent on a vacuolar Zn2+ transporter other than MTP1. Overexpression of ZIF1 could, in some transgenic lines, confer a significant increase in growth in the presence of inhibitory concentrations of Zn. The absence of Zn tolerance in all overexpression lines is probably because expression of endogenous ZIF1 is normally high in these conditions. Nevertheless, this may argue in favor of the second model, where overexpression of a protein transporting a Zn ligand bound to Zn might more readily confer increased tolerance because its function would be independent of a separate mechanism transporting Zn itself into the vacuole. The interveinal chlorosis in 35S-ZIF1 transgenic lines may be caused by a cytosolic deficiency of the ZIF1 substrate, whether that is Zn, an organic acid, or both. The pattern of bleaching in these lines is reciprocal to ZIF1p-GUS expression in transgenic plants grown on MM, suggesting that the phenotype may be a result of high expression of ZIF1 in cells where it is not normally expressed.

In addition to Zn, zif1 mutants or ZIF1 expression also showed effects in the presence of excess Cd, Ni, or Mn. That zif1 mutants are also Cd sensitive may be because Zn and Cd share chemical similarities and are often associated in biological systems, such as in Zn-Cd hyperaccumulators. The candidate Zn ligand, citrate, is also predicted by computer simulation to be the predominant ligand for Cd in tobacco vacuoles (Wang et al., 1991). Ni citrate has also been implicated in Ni tolerance and Ni hyperaccumulation (Kramer et al., 2000). Whereas experiments investigating the mechanism of ion transport into oat (Avena sativa) root tonoplast vesicles indicated that Zn and Cd are transported into vacuoles via proton antiport (Salt and Wagner, 1993; Gonzalez et al., 1999), Ni2+-H+ antiport or nucleotide-dependent Ni transport could not be demonstrated and the evidence suggested a slower association of Ni with the tonoplast rather than transport across the membrane (Gries and Wagner, 1998). Studies using the Ni hyperaccumulator Thlaspi goesingense and the related nonaccumulator Thlaspi arvense suggest that up to 75% of symplastic Ni in the hyperaccumulator and 25% in the nonaccumulator are associated with the vacuolar fraction of shoot tissue (Kramer et al., 2000). However, the subcellular fractionation technique used would not have distinguished between tonoplast-associated Ni and Ni localized within the vacuolar lumen. Moreover, this result also implies that, at least in the nonaccumulator species, a large proportion of Ni remains in the cytosol, presumably bound by ligands, without causing toxicity. If the ZIF1 substrate is accumulating in the cytosol of zif1 mutants and has sufficient affinity to sequester excess Ni at cytosolic pH, these plants may show increased Ni tolerance. This would also imply that the ZIF1 substrate is not able to effectively chelate Zn or Cd in the cytosol. Alternatively, the Ni tolerance observed in zif1 mutants may be an indirect effect due to increased accumulation of Zn in the cytosol. The response of ZIF1 in plants exposed to increased Mn suggests a possible role for ZIF1 in Mn tolerance. Although the vacuole is the major store for Mn (Pittman, 2005), Mn sensitivity was not observed in zif1 mutants, suggesting that the effect of Mn on ZIF1 expression may be indirect.

It remains unclear whether AtZIFL1, AtZIFL2, and the putative plant orthologs are likely to have functions similar to or divergent from ZIF1. Although ZIFL1 and ZIFL2 do not appear to contribute to Zn tolerance at the level of the whole plant, they may have similar substrate specificities but function at different membranes or in different cell types. The only indication of function for the plant orthologs is the identification of Zm-mfs1 as a transcript that is induced by a range of defense-related conditions, including fungal pathogen infection (Simmons et al., 2003). It may be that the maize ortholog has a function divergent from ZIF1; however, there is mounting evidence for a relationship between metal accumulation and pathogen resistance (Boyd, 2004; Hanson et al., 2004; Dellagi et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2005; Mirouze et al., 2006; Poschenrieder et al., 2006), presenting the possibility that the biochemical functions of Zm-mfs1 and ZIF1 may be similar even though the physiological roles have diverged.

In summary, we suggest that ZIF1 plays an important role in Zn tolerance in A. thaliana by participating in vacuolar sequestration of Zn. Because many MFS proteins transport organic molecules, the function of ZIF1 may be to transport the primary Zn ligand across the tonoplast. In the plant species studied, this ligand is likely to be an organic acid, most commonly citrate. However, definitive evidence for the identity of this molecule in plants remains elusive. Further characterization of ZIF1 and the putative plant orthologs should provide insight into the identity of the Zn ligand in vacuoles and its importance for Zn tolerance in a range of plant species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants were grown in soil and agar as previously described (Howden et al., 1995). MM comprised 5 mm KNO3, 2.5 mm KH2PO4, 2 mm MgSO4, 2 mm Ca(NO3)2, 70 μm H3BO3, 50 μm Fe(III)-EDTA, 14 μm MnSO4, 10 μm NaCl, 1 μm ZnSO4, 0.5 μm CuSO4, 0.2 μm (NH4)6Mo7O24, and 0.01 μm CoCl2 (pH 5.8) with 2% (w/v) Suc and 0.8% to 1.0% Bacto agar for solid medium. For metal-sensitivity experiments, 7-d-old seedlings were transferred from MM to MM plates containing the indicated concentration of metal. Four plants of two genotypes were grown on each plate and each genotype was grown on two plates for each condition, providing eight individuals of each genotype for each condition. Plates were grown vertically for an additional 10 d and shoot fresh weight and root length or root fresh weight were determined.

The zif1-1 mutant was identified from a T-DNA line generated in the Ws ecotype (Krysan et al., 1999) and the location of the insertion was determined using inverse PCR and nucleotide sequencing. T-DNA mutants in Col were identified using the SIGnAL Web site (http://signal.salk.edu) and ordered through the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; Alonso et al., 2003). The location of the insertions was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing of PCR products amplified using a left-border primer and primers specific to the gene. All lines were backcrossed to the wild type, and homozygous mutant lines were identified from F2 populations by PCR using gene-specific primers that flank the T-DNA for the wild-type allele or the left-border primer and a gene-specific primer for the mutant allele. The zif1-3 allele was identified by screening EMS-mutagenized Col-0 M2 seed (Lehle Seeds) on MM containing 100 μm Zn. M3 plants were backcrossed to Col-0 and, after confirming 3:1 segregation of the phenotype in F2, a homozygous F3 population was identified, which was crossed to zif1-2 for complementation. Nucleotide sequencing of the putative exons of zif1-3 indicated a single base pair substitution of G to A at position 1,414 of the predicted cDNA. Primers are described in Supplemental Table S1.

RT-PCR Techniques

Total RNA was extracted using the RNAqueous RNA extraction kit (Ambion). To determine gene expression in mutants and transgenics, 30 mg of tissue pooled from 8-d-old seedlings were used. To determine ZIF1 metal regulation, roots or shoots from four 14-d-old seedlings were pooled. RNA was DNAse treated using the DNA-free kit (Ambion) and cDNA was made from 5 μg of RNA using the SuperScript first-strand cDNA synthesis system (Invitrogen). PCR was performed using the primer sets indicated. For semiquantitative PCR, gels were stained with SYBR Green I (Invitrogen) and scanned using a Typhoon 8600 variable mode imager (Molecular Dynamics) in fluorescence acquisition mode using a fluorescein emission filter. The intensity of bands was quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). For quantitative real-time PCR, cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of DNAse-treated RNA, extracted from leaves from three seedlings or roots from six seedlings, and real-time PCR was performed in duplicate on 20 ng of cDNA using the platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix UDG (Invitrogen) with primers at a concentration of 200 nm on a Rotor-Gene 3000 (Corbett Research). Primer efficiencies were determined and relative expression of ZIF1 was calculated using the ΔΔCt method by normalizing to ACT2 expression.

Measurement of Metal Content in Plant Tissues

Metal content of plant tissue was determined as described previously (Hussain et al., 2004). Briefly, plant tissues were harvested and oven dried at 70°C for 4 d. Weighed samples were digested in 70% HNO3 overnight at room temperature, then at 80°C for 2 h. Digested samples were diluted to a final concentration of 7% HNO3 with deionized water and metals were measured using a Vista-AX ICP-AES (Varian).

ZIF1p-GUS Fusion Construct Lines

The upstream region of ZIF1 from −1,991 to +84 was amplified by PCR from Col genomic DNA using primers designed to include an upstream SalI site and a downstream SpeI site. This fragment, which spans the entire intergenic region and encodes approximately 1.9 kb of the promoter region to the adjacent gene and the first 28 codons of ZIF1, was ligated into the SalI and XbaI sites of pBI101 (CLONTECH) so that the ATG of ZIF1 was in frame with the GUS gene. Primers are described in Supplemental Table S1. The ZIF1p-GUS construct was transformed into Col plants by the Agrobacterium-mediated floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). A total of eight independent homozygous T3 lines were identified that segregated 3:1 kanamycin resistance in T2 generations. Histochemical staining of transgenic lines was carried out according to Jefferson et al. (1987). Six of the eight lines showed the same GUS expression pattern and two representative lines were selected for detailed analysis. For sections, stained tissues were imbedded in paraffin essentially as described previously (Johnson et al., 2002) and 8-μm sections were made.

35S-ZIF1, 35S-ZIF1-GFP, and 35S-ZIF1-His Construct Lines

The open reading frame of ZIF1 was amplified by PCR from Col cDNA using an upstream primer that included a SalI site immediately preceding the ATG and alternative downstream primers, both including a SpeI site that spanned the final codon and either maintained the TGA stop codon for 35S-ZIF1 or omitted the stop for 35S-ZIF1-GFP. For 35S-ZIF1, the fragment was ligated into the XhoI and XbaI sites of 35S-GFP-JFH1 (Hong et al., 1999), replacing GFP. For 35S-ZIF1-GFP, the fragment was ligated into the XhoI and SpeI sites, in frame with GFP. The 35S-ZIF1-His construct was generated by ligating an adapter duplex, designed to include SpeI and BamHI sites, which flank a 6×-His epitope sequence, into the SpeI and BamHI sites of 35S-ZIF1-GFP. Primers are described in Supplemental Table S1. Constructs were transformed into Col wild-type and zif1-2 plants by the Agrobacterium-mediated floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998) and homozygous T3 populations were identified from T2 populations segregating 3:1 BASTA (glufosinate-ammonium) resistance. Eight 35S-ZIF1, 10 35S-ZIF1-GFP, and five 35S-ZIF1-His independent transgenic lines were identified in the Col background and six independent lines were identified for each construct in zif1-2. Fluorescence images were captured by laser-scanning confocal microscopy with an Olympus BX60 microscope connected to an Optiscan F900E master control unit using tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate and fluorescein isothiocyanate filters simultaneously. The 35S-GFP and 35S-ShMTP1-GFP control lines used for imaging were described previously (Delhaize et al., 2003).

The AGI locus identifiers are as follows: ZIF1, At5g13740; ZIFL1, At5g13750; and ZIFL2, At3g43790. The DNA sequences can be found in the GenBank data libraries: ZIF1, NM_121377; ZIFL1, NM_180705; and ZIFL2, NM_114247. The accession numbers of insertion mutants are: zif1-2, SALK_011408; zifl2-1, SALK_030690; and zifl2-1, SALK_059042.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

  • Supplemental Table S1. List of primers.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental Data]

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Professor Alan Baker and Dr. Scott Laidlaw for access to ICP-AES, Bruce Abaloz for embedding and sectioning, Dr. Manny Delhaize for providing 35S-GFP and 35S-ShMTP8-GFP transgenic lines, Professor Masayoshi Maeshima for providing mtp1-1 seeds, and Quentin Lang for photography. We thank the Australian Research Council for support.

1

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council and the Albert Shimmins Fund (financial support to M.J.H. during preparation of the manuscript).

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Chris Cobbett (ccobbett@unimelb.edu.au).

[C]

Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.

[W]

The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

[OA]

Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

References

  1. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen HM, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301 653–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ardon O, Bussey H, Philpott C, Ward DM, Davis-Kaplan S, Verroneau S, Jiang B, Kaplan J (2001) Identification of a Candida albicans ferrichrome transporter and its characterization by expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 276 43049–43055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arrivault S, Senger T, Kramer U (2006) The Arabidopsis metal tolerance protein AtMTP3 maintains metal homeostasis by mediating Zn exclusion from the shoot under Fe deficiency and Zn oversupply. Plant J 46 861–879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelsen KB, Palmgren MG (2001) Inventory of the superfamily of P-type ion pumps in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126 696–706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter I, Tchieu J, Sussman MR, Boutry M, Palmgren MG, Gribskov M, Harper JF, Axelsen KB (2003) Genomic comparison of P-type ATPase ion pumps in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol 132 618–628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Becher M, Talke IN, Krall L, Kramer U (2004) Cross-species microarray transcript profiling reveals high constitutive expression of metal homeostasis genes in shoots of the zinc hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant J 37 251–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berg JM, Shi Y (1996) The galvanization of biology: a growing appreciation for the roles of zinc. Science 271 1081–1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloss T, Clemens S, Nies D (2002) Characterization of the ZAT1p zinc transporter from Arabidopsis thaliana in microbial model organisms and reconstituted proteoliposomes. Planta 214 783–791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyd RS (2004) Ecology of metal hyperaccumulation. New Phytol 162 563–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Callahan DL, Baker AJM, Kolev SD, Wedd AG (2006) Metal ion ligands in hyperaccumulating plants. J Biol Inorg Chem 11 2–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clemens S (2001) Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 212 475–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16 735–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cobbett CS, Hussain D, Haydon MJ (2003) Structural and functional relationships between type 1(B) heavy metal-transporting P-type ATPases in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 159 315–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Delhaize E, Kataoka T, Hebb DM, White RG, Ryan PR (2003) Genes encoding proteins of the cation diffusion facilitator family that confer manganese tolerance. Plant Cell 15 1131–1142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dellagi A, Rigault M, Segond D, Roux C, Kraepiel Y, Cellier F, Briat J-F, Gaymard F, Expert D (2005) Siderophore-mediated upregulation of Arabidopsis ferritin expression in response to Erwinia chrysanthemi infection. Plant J 43 262–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Desbrosses-Fonrouge A-G, Voigt K, Schroder A, Arrivault S, Thomine S, Kramer U (2005) Arabidopsis thaliana MTP1 is a Zn transporter in the vacuolar membrane which mediates Zn detoxification and drives leaf Zn accumulation. FEBS Lett 579 4165–4174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Drager DB, Desbrosses-Fonrouge AG, Krach C, Chardonnens AN, Meyer RC, Saumitou-Laprade P, Kramer U (2004) Two genes encoding Arabidopsis halleri MTP1 metal transport proteins co-segregate with zinc tolerance and account for high MTP1 transcript levels. Plant J 39 425–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Elbaz B, Shoshani-Knaani N, David-Assael O, Mizrachy-Dagri T, Mizrahi K, Saul H, Brook E, Berezin I, Shaul O (2006) High expression in leaves of the zinc hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri of AhMHX, a homolog of an Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar metal/proton exchanger. Plant Cell Environ 29 1179–1190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Emmerlich V, Linka N, Reinhold T, Hurth MA, Traub M, Martinoia E, Neuhaus HE (2003) The plant homolog to the human sodium/dicarboxylic cotransporter is the vacuolar malate carrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 11122–11126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eren E, Arguello JM (2004) Arabidopsis HMA2, a divalent heavy metal-transporting PIB-type ATPase, is involved in cytoplasmic Zn2+ homeostasis. Plant Physiol 136 3712–3723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gaither LA, Eide DJ (2001) Eukaryotic zinc transporters and their regulation. Biometals 14 251–270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gonzalez A, Koren'Kov V, Wagner GJ (1999) A comparison of Zn, Mn, Cd, and Ca transport mechanisms in oat root tonoplast vesicles. Physiol Plant 106 203–209 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gravot A, Lieutaud A, Verret F, Auroy P, Vavasseur A, Richaud P (2004) AtHMA3, a plant P-1B-ATPase, functions as a Cd/Pb transporter in yeast. FEBS Lett 561 22–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gries GE, Wagner GJ (1998) Association of nickel versus transport of cadmium and calcium in tonoplast vesicles of oat roots. Planta 204 390–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grotz N, Fox T, Connolly E, Park W, Guerinot ML, Eide D (1998) Identification of a family of zinc transporter genes from Arabidopsis that respond to zinc deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95 7220–7224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Haas H, Schoeser M, Lesuisse E, Ernst JF, Parson W, Abt B, Winkelmann G, Oberegger H (2003) Characterization of the Aspergillus nidulans transporters for the siderophores enterobactin and triacetylfusarinine C. Biochem J 371 505–513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hammond JP, Bowen HC, White PJ, Mills V, Pyke KA, Baker AJM, Whiting SN, May ST, Broadley MR (2006) A comparison of the Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi arvense shoot transcriptomes. New Phytol 170 239–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hanson B, Lindblom SD, Loeffler ML, Pilon-Smits EAH (2004) Selenium protects plants from phloem-feeding aphids due to both deterrence and toxicity. New Phytol 162 655–662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heymann P, Ernst JF, Winkelmann G (1999) Identification of a fungal triacetylfusarinine C siderophore transport gene (TAF1) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a member of the major facilitator superfamily. Biometals 12 301–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Heymann P, Ernst JF, Winkelmann G (2000. a) A gene of the major facilitator superfamily encodes a transporter for enterobactin (Enb1p) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biometals 13 65–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Heymann P, Ernst JF, Winkelmann G (2000. b) Identification and substrate specificity of a ferrichrome-type siderophore transporter (Arn1p) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 186 221–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hong BM, Ichida A, Wang YW, Gens JS, Pickard BC, Harper JF (1999) Identification of a calmodulin-regulated Ca2+-ATPase in the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Physiol 119 1165–1175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Howden R, Goldsbrough PB, Andersen CR, Cobbett CS (1995) Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana are phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiol 107 1059–1066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hussain D, Haydon MJ, Wang Y, Wong E, Sherson SM, Young J, Camakaris J, Harper JF, Cobbett CS (2004) P-type ATPase heavy metal transporters with roles in essential zinc homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16 1327–1339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ishimaru Y, Suzuki M, Kobayashi T, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2005) OsZIP4, a novel zinc-regulated zinc transporter in rice. J Exp Bot 56 3207–3214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) Gus fusions—beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6 3901–3907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jiang RF, Ma DY, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (2005) Cadmium hyperaccumulation protects Thlaspi caerulescens from leaf feeding damage by thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). New Phytol 167 805–814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson CS, Kolevski B, Smyth DR (2002) TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2, a trichome and seed coat development gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a WRKY transcription factor. Plant Cell 14 1359–1375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kobae Y, Uemura T, Sato MH, Ohnishi M, Mimura T, Nakagawa T, Maeshima M (2004) Zinc transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana AtMTP1 is localized to vacuolar membranes and implicated in zinc homeostasis. Plant Cell Physiol 45 1749–1758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kramer U, Pickering IJ, Prince RC, Raskin I, Salt DE (2000) Subcellular localization and speciation of nickel in hyperaccumulator and non-accumulator Thlaspi species. Plant Physiol 122 1343–1354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR (1999) T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11 2283–2290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lopez-Millan AF, Ellis DR, Grusak MA (2004) Identification and characterization of several new members of the ZIP family of metal ion transporters in Medicago truncatula. Plant Mol Biol 54 583–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mills RF, Krijger GC, Baccarini PJ, Hall JL, Williams LE (2003) Functional expression of AtHMA4, a P-1B-type ATPase of the Zn/Co/Cd/Pb subclass. Plant J 35 164–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mirouze M, Sels J, Richard O, Czernic P, Loubet S, Jacquier A, Francois I, Cammue BPA, Lebrun M, Berthomieu P, et al (2006) A putative novel role for plant defensins: a defensin from the zinc hyper-accumulating plant, Arabidopsis halleri, confers zinc tolerance. Plant J 47 329–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moreau S, Thomson RM, Kaiser BN, Trevaskis B, Guerinot ML, Udvardi MK, Puppo A, Day DA (2002) GmZIP1 encodes a symbiosis-specific zinc transporter in soybean. J Biol Chem 277 4738–4746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Muchhal US, Pardo JM, Raghothama KG (1996) Phosphate transporters from the higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 10519–10523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Oleski N, Mahdavi P, Bennett AB (1987) Transport properties of the tomato fruit tonoplast. II. Citrate transport. Plant Physiol 84 997–1000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pao SS, Paulsen IT, Saier MH (1998) Major facilitator superfamily. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62 1–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Papoyan A, Kochian LV (2004) Identification of Thlaspi caerulescens genes that may be involved in heavy metal hyperaccumulation and tolerance. Characterization of a novel heavy metal transporting ATPase. Plant Physiol 136 3814–3823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pence NS, Larsen PB, Ebbs SD, Letham DL, Lasat MM, Garvin DF, Eide D, Kochian LV (2000) The molecular physiology of heavy metal transport in the Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97 4956–4960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pittman JK (2005) Managing the manganese: molecular mechanisms of manganese transport and homeostasis. New Phytol 167 733–742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Poschenrieder C, Tolra R, Barcelo J (2006) Can metals defend plants against biotic stress? Trends Plant Sci 11 288–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ren Q, Paulsen IT (2005) Comparative analyses of fundamental differences in membrane transport capabilities in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. PLoS Comput Biol 1 e27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rentsch D, Martinoia E (1991) Citrate transport into barley mesophyll vacuoles—comparison with malate-uptake activity. Planta 184 532–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Salt DE, Prince RC, Baker AJM, Raskin I, Pickering IJ (1999) Zinc ligands in the metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens as determined using x-ray absorption spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 33 713–717 [Google Scholar]
  56. Salt DE, Wagner GJ (1993) Cadmium transport across tonoplast of vesicles from oat roots. Evidence for a Cd2+/H+ antiport activity. J Biol Chem 268 12297–12302 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sarret G, Saumitou-Laprade P, Bert V, Proux O, Hazemann J-L, Traverse A, Marcus MA, Manceau A (2002) Forms of zinc accumulated in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Physiol 130 1815–1826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sauer N, Stolz J (1994) Suc1 and Suc2—two sucrose transporters from Arabidopsis thaliana - expression and characterization in bakers yeast and identification of the histidine-tagged protein. Plant J 6 67–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Shaul O, Hilgemann DW, de-Almeida-Engler J, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Galili G (1999) Cloning and characterization of a novel Mg2+/H+ exchanger. EMBO J 18 3973–3980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shimada T, Nakano R, Shulaev V, Sadka A, Blumwald E (2006) Vacuolar citrate/H+ symporter of citrus juice cells. Planta 224 472–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Simmons CR, Fridlender M, Navarro PA, Yalpani N (2003) A maize defense-inducible gene is a major facilitator superfamily member related to bacterial multidrug resistance efflux antiporters. Plant Mol Biol 52 433–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith FW, Ealing PM, Dong B, Delhaize E (1997) The cloning of two Arabidopsis genes belonging to a phosphate transporter family. Plant J 11 83–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Stolz J, Stadler R, Opekarova M, Sauer N (1994) Functional reconstitution of the solubilized Arabidopsis thaliana Stp1 monosaccharide-H+ symporter in lipid vesicles and purification of the histidine-tagged protein from transgenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant J 6 225–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Talke IN, Hanikenne M, Kramer U (2006) Zinc-dependent global transcriptional control, transcriptional deregulation, and higher gene copy number for genes in metal homeostasis of the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Physiol 142 148–167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tsay YF, Schroeder JI, Feldmann KA, Crawford NM (1993) The herbicide sensitivity gene Chl1 of Arabidopsis encodes a nitrate-inducible nitrate transporter. Cell 72 705–713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vallee BL, Auld DS (1990) Zinc coordination, function, and structure of zinc enzymes and other proteins. Biochemistry 29 5647–5659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. van der Zaal BJ, Neuteboom LW, Pinas JE, Chardonnens AN, Schat H, Verkleij JA, Hooykaas PJ (1999) Overexpression of a novel Arabidopsis gene related to putative zinc-transporter genes from animals can lead to enhanced zinc resistance and accumulation. Plant Physiol 119 1047–1055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Verret F, Gravot A, Auroy P, Leonhardt N, David P, Nussaume L, Vavasseur A, Richaud P (2004) Overexpression of AtHMA4 enhances root-to-shoot translocation of zinc and cadmium and plant metal tolerance. FEBS Lett 576 306–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Verret F, Gravot A, Auroy P, Preveral S, Forestier C, Vavasseur A, Richaud P (2005) Heavy metal transport by AtHMA4 involves the N-terminal degenerated metal binding domain and the C-terminal His11 stretch. FEBS Lett 579 1515–1522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang J, Evangelou BP, Nielsen MT, Wagner GJ (1991) Computer-simulated evaluation of possible mechanisms for quenching heavy metal ion activity in plant vacuoles: I. Cadmium. Plant Physiol 97 1154–1160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang J, Evangelou BP, Nielsen MT, Wagner GJ (1992) Computer-simulated evaluation of possible mechanisms for sequestering metal ion activity in plant vacuoles: II. Zinc. Plant Physiol 99 621–626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wintz H, Fox T, Wu YY, Feng V, Chen WQ, Chang HS, Zhu T, Vulpe C (2003) Expression profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana in mineral deficiencies reveal novel transporters involved in metal homeostasis. J Biol Chem 278 47644–47653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yamaguchi A, Iwasakiohba Y, Ono N, Kanekoohdera M, Sawai T (1991) Stoichiometry of metal-tetracycline/H+ antiport mediated by transposon Tn10-encoded tetracycline resistance protein in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 282 415–418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Yamaguchi A, Ono N, Akasaka T, Noumi T, Sawai T (1990) Metal-tetracycline/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli encoded by a transposon, Tn10—the role of the conserved dipeptide, Ser65-Asp66, in tetracycline transport. J Biol Chem 265 15525–15530 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Yun CW, Ferea T, Rashford J, Ardon O, Brown PO, Botstein D, Kaplan J, Philpott CC (2000) Desferrioxamine-mediated iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae—evidence for two pathways of iron uptake. J Biol Chem 275 10709–10715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Yun CW, Tiedeman JS, Moore RE, Philpott CC (2000) Siderophore-iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae—identification of ferrichrome and fusarinine transporters. J Biol Chem 275 16354–16359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental Data]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES