Table 2.
Comparison | 1Estimate | 95% Lower Limit | 95% Upper Limit | ChiSq | P-value | Sig |
Period 1: control vs. academic detailing | 0.701 | 0.470 | 1.045 | 3.04 | 0.081 | NS |
Period 2: control vs. academic detailing | 1.022 | 0.597 | 1.749 | 0.01 | 0.938 | NS |
Period 3: control vs. academic detailing | 1.080 | 0.690 | 1.689 | 0.11 | 0.737 | NS |
Period 4: control vs. academic detailing | 0.831 | 0.565 | 1.223 | 0.88 | 0.348 | NS |
Control: period 1 vs. period 2 | 0.896 | 0.629 | 1.277 | 0.37 | 0.545 | NS |
Control: period 1 vs. period 3 | 0.933 | 0.758 | 1.150 | 0.42 | 0.517 | NS |
Control: period 1 vs. period 4 | 0.975 | 0.791 | 1.202 | 0.06 | 0.813 | NS |
Control: period 2 vs. period 3 | 1.041 | 0.714 | 1.519 | 0.04 | 0.834 | NS |
Control: period 2 vs. period 4 | 1.088 | 0.768 | 1.540 | 0.22 | 0.636 | NS |
Control: period 3 vs. period 4 | 1.045 | 0.846 | 1.289 | 0.17 | 0.685 | NS |
Academic detailing: period 1 vs. period 2 | 1.306 | 0.951 | 1.795 | 2.72 | 0.099 | NS |
Academic detailing: period 1 vs. period 3 | 1.438 | 1.254 | 1.649 | 26.94 | <.0001 | * |
Academic detailing: period 1 vs. period 4 | 1.156 | 0.956 | 1.398 | 2.24 | 0.134 | NS |
Academic detailing: period 2 vs. period 3 | 1.101 | 0.807 | 1.501 | 0.37 | 0.544 | NS |
Academic detailing: period 2 vs. period 4 | 0.885 | 0.643 | 1.218 | 0.56 | 0.453 | NS |
Academic detailing: period 3 vs. period 4 | 0.804 | 0.656 | 0.986 | 4.39 | 0.036 | * |
Nb. No adjustment has been made for multiple comparisons
1The estimate represents the post hoc comparison Rate Ratio
NS – Not Significant
* Indicates p < 0.05.