Skip to main content
. 2007 May;48(5):493–499.

Table 1.

Comparison of Neospora caninum ELISA results from serum (cow level, 1 sampling date) and bulk milk (herd level, 4 sampling dates) from 11 dairy farms

Bulk Milk ELISA S/P Ratioa
Cow Level Serum ELISA Test Resultsb
Herd May ’04 May ’05 June ’05 Sept ’05 Prevalence (%) Number of positive cows Total number of cows
1 0.04 0.25 0.64 0.15 1.3 1 77
2 0.34 0.82 0.62 0.25 5.7 2 35
3 0.85 0.28 0.31 0.40 1.5 1 66
4 0.61 0.28 0.33 0.41 5.6 4 72
5 0.50 0.47 0.64 0.41 9.8 4 41
6 0.65 0.21 0.14 0.50 15.4 4 26
7 0.43 0.70 0.65 0.67 17.5 7 40
8 0.67 0.54 0.34 0.78 17.9 7 39
9 0.42 0.64 0.64 0.99 27.4 23 84
10 0.55 0.69 0.60 1.00 30.6 22 72
11 0.14 1.01 0.75 1.09 17.9 12 67
a

Sample-to-Positive Ratio — Bold printed numbers indicate a positive bulk milk result (S/P ≥ 0.60)

b

Individual serum samples were collected on the same day as the bulk milk sample in September 2005. All numbers refer only to lactating cows contributing to the bulk tank on the sampling date