Skip to main content
. 2000 May 16;97(11):5883–5888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100127197

Table 2.

Sedimentation equilibrium results for syt249–421 (molecular mass of 19,853 Da) and syt261–421 (molecular mass of 18,395 Da)

Single ideal species model
Sample Molecular mass, Da Standard deviation of fit
apo-syt249–421 26,608 6.36  × 10−3
syt249–421 + 110 μM Ca2+ 24,435 5.36  × 10−3
syt249–421 + 550 μM Ca2+ 26,108 7.23  × 10−3
syt249–421 + 1.1 mM Ca2+ 26,273 4.43  × 10−3
Single non-ideal species model
Sample Molecular mass, Da Standard deviation of fit
apo-syt249–421 15,971 2.54  × 10−3
syt249–421 + 110 μM Ca2+ 16,734 3.01  × 10−3
syt249–421 + 550 μM Ca2+ 15,202 2.78  × 10−3
syt249–421 + 1.1 mM Ca2+ 19,232 3.24  × 10−3
Single ideal species model
Sample Molecular mass, Da Standard deviation of fit
apo-syt261–421 19,969 6.20  × 10−3
syt261–421 + 110 μM Ca2+ 19,186 6.66  × 10−3
syt261–421 + 550 μM Ca2+ 21,637 3.68  × 10−3
syt261–421 + 1.1 mM Ca2+ 21,902 6.30  × 10−3
Single non-ideal species model
Sample Molecular mass, Da Standard deviation of fit
apo-syt261–421 17,124 3.63  × 10−3
syt261–421 + 110 μM Ca2+ 18,204 3.81  × 10−3
syt261–421 + 550 μM Ca2+ 17,756 3.43  × 10−3
syt261–421 + 1.1 mM Ca2+ 20,811 6.31  × 10−3

Both truncated versions of the protein are best fit using a single non-ideal species model and are monomeric in solution.