Table 2.

Comparison Between Participants and Nonparticipants’ Baseline and End-of-program Self-assessment of Skills and Level of Enjoyment in Curriculum Development Activities, Cohorts 2–9*

	Mean Baseline Scores					Mean Post-Program Scores
	Participants (N)	Nonparticipants (N)	Difference in Scores	Unadjusted p-Value	Adjusted p-Value†	Participants (N)	Nonparticipants (N)	Difference in scores	Unadjusted p-Value	Adjusted p-Value†
Rate skills in curriculum/program development‡	2.26 (38)	2.79 (28)	−0.52	0.005	0.03	3.53 (59)	2.33 (36)	+1.20	<0.0001	<0.0001
Rate skills in curriculum/program implementation‡	2.32 (34)	2.83 (29)	−0.51	0.01	0.05	3.28 (50)	2.70 (33)	+0.58	0.003	0.02
Rate skills in curriculum/program evaluation‡	2.11 (27)	2.55 (20)	−0.44	0.08	0.33	3.12 (51)	2.42 (26)	+0.70	0.004	0.02
Level of enjoyment in curriculum/program development§	2.19 (37)	1.80 (40)	+0.39	0.04	0.01	2.28 (57)	1.61 (38)	+0.67	<0.0001	<0.0001
Level of enjoyment in curriculum/program evaluation§	1.76 (29)	1.50 (38)	+0.26	0.21	0.12	1.81 (53)	1.33 (39)	+0.48	0.04	0.11

*All comparisons done using unpaired ttests

^†Controlled for any fellowship training, any faculty appointment type, amount of time spent in hospital-based and community-based practice, percentage of time spent in teaching and administration, research salary support, and previous experience in evaluating curricula

^‡Skills were rated on a 6-point scale, where 0 = none, 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good, and 5 = excellent

^§Level of enjoyment was assessed using a 4-point scale, where 0 = none, 1 = a little, 2 = moderate amount, 3 = a lot