Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 May;47(5):2036–2044. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0524

Table 3.

Suture Defects in Transgenic Mice Compared with Age-Matched Nontransgenic Control Mice

Grade of Sutural Defect
Transgenic Line Genotype Lenses (n) Grade 0 Grade I Grade II Grade III
Line 8168 (R116C) Tg* 54 12 (22) 15 (28) 17 (31) 10 (19)
Control 50 29 (58) 16 (32) 5 (10) 0 (0)
Line 8165 (R116C) Tg* 74 12 (16) 24 (32) 25 (34) 13 (18)
Control 46 35 (76) 7 (15) 3 (7) 1 (2)
Line 8170 (R116C) Tg* 72 25 (34) 7 (10) 31 (43) 9 (13)
Control 62 41 (66) 12 (19) 9 (15) 0 (0)
Line 10694 (wild type) Tg 62 52 (84) 6 (10) 2 (3) 2 (3)
Control 70 53 (76) 11 (16) 3 (4) 3 (4)

Lenses were examined ex vivo by stereomicroscopy under dark-field illumination. Sutural defects were graded according to the maximum width of a gap at the posterior suture. Grades were 0, no gap; I, gap width is < 15 μm; II, gap width is 16 to 30 μm; III, gap width is > 30 μm. Tg, transgenic animals; controls were age-matched nontransgenic littermates. Scores were not significantly different among lenses examined at the ages of 9 to 11 weeks, 20 to 22 weeks, and 28 to 30 weeks. Therefore, data from all age groups were pooled. Data are number of lenses, with percentage of total group in parentheses. For the purpose of statistical analyses, grades II and III are combined. Test results for interaction between level of gene expression and severity of suture defects (transgenic group only) were not significant (P = 0.05).

*

Distribution of severity of lens defect differed between transgenic and control mice (P < 0.05).