Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 16;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-4-3

Table 2.

The practical impact on conclusions of three meta-analyses submitted to publication bias adjustment.

Authors Topic Comparison Outcome Non-adjusted meta-analysis conclusion (transcription) Adjusted meta-analysis conclusion
Hopkins 14 Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for cesarean section Any single dose of systemic antibiotic versus any multiple dose Endometritis "There is no evidence from this meta-analysis to recommend multiple doses of antibiotics" Any single dose systemic regimen (pre, post or intra-operative) may be more effective than any multiple dose regimen
Hodnett 15 Continuous support for women during childbirth Continuous one-to-one intrapartum support versus usual care Cesarean birth "Women who had continuous, one-to-one support during labour were less likely to have a caesarean birth" Continuous support may not reduce the occurrence of cesarean birth comparing to usual care.
Cheng 16 Interventions for emergency contraception Mifepristone mid-dose (25–50 mg) versus low-doses (≤ 10 mg) Observed number of pregnancies "Although the overall meta-analysis shows fewer pregnancies with the mid-dose... when the analysis is limited to the five trials with adequate allocation concealment...this effect is no longer evident" Mifepristone mid-doses (25–50 mg) may not be more effective than low doses (≤ 10 mg)