Table 3.
The independent and combined influence of timing of sexual maturation (SM timinga) and waist circumference on log-transformed mean BMI at follow-up, reported as standardised beta coefficientsb
| Independent variables | Boys | Girls | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
| β | P-value | β | P-value | β | P-value | β | P-value | |
| SM timinga | 0.09 | < .000 | 0.12 | .65 | -0.09 | .002 | 0.68 | .006 |
| Waist circumference | 0.68 | .005 | 0.69 | < .000 | 0.60 | < .000 | 1.53 | < .000 |
| SM timing*waist circumference | -0.03 | .92 | -1.11 | .002 | ||||
| Model, adjusted R2 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.39 | ||||
a SM timing denotes pubertal status in boys and age at menarche in girls, both included as continuous variables in analyses
b Coefficients are adjusted for age at baseline.