TABLE 6.
P-test results and ΦST values for community comparisons made in this study
| Comparison | P value | ΦST value |
|---|---|---|
| Same temp, different chemistry, same spring | ||
| AS103 Fe vs AS103 Fe-S | 0.0001 | 0.433 |
| AS103 S vs AS103 Fe-S | 0.0001 | 0.794 |
| Different temp, same chemistry, same spring | ||
| RM-70 vs RM-65 | 0.0001 | 0.236 |
| RM-70 vs RM-60 | 0.0001 | 0.524 |
| RM-65 vs RM-60 | 0.0001 | 0.207 |
| A102-70 vs AS102-65 | NSa | 0.090 |
| A102-65 vs AS102-60 | NS | 0.009 |
| A102-70 vs AS102-60 | 0.0008 | 0.086 |
| A101-70 vs AS101-65 | 0.0001 | 0.075 |
| Same temp, different chemistry, different springs | ||
| RM-65 vs AS101-65 | 0.0001 | 0.593 |
| RM-60 vs AS102-60 | 0.0001 | 0.681 |
| Different temp, same chemistry, different springs | ||
| RM-70 vs AS103 Fe | 0.0001 | 0.274 |
| RM-65 vs AS103 Fe | 0.0001 | 0.244 |
| A101-60 vs AS102-60 | 0.0001 | 0.124 |
NS, not significant.