Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 2;73(8):2532–2540. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02113-06

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Strain(s) Relevant characteristic(s)a Source or reference
Acinetobacter baumannii
    Ab1-Ab10 Imir Merr Ampr This studyb
Enterobacter agglomerans
    EaJ0-EaJ9 EaJ0 (ESBL strains), Ampr This studyb
Enterobacter cloacae
    Ec1-Ec12 ESBL strains, Ampr This studyb
Escherichia coli
    DH5α endA1 hsdR17 (rk mk+) supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA relA1 φ80d lacZΔ M15Δ (lacZYA-argF)U169 18
    E1-E13 Ampr This studyc
Klebsiella oxycota
    KoJ1-KoJ8 Ampr This studyb
    KoC1-KoC6 Ampr This studyc
Klebsiella pneumoniae
    10693 Phage host, Amps ATCC 23357
    Kp1-Kp108d ESBL strains, Ampr This studyc
Proteus mirabilis
    Pm1, Pm3, Pm18, Pm40, Pm51, Pm59, Pm69, Pm70, Pm72, Pm73, Pm84, Pm97, Pm103, Pm111 ESBL strains, Ampr 59
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    27853 Amps 38
    Pa1-Pa6 Imir Merr Ampr This studyb
Serratia marcescens
    Sm1-Sm4, Sm8 ESBL strains, Ampr 58
a

Amp, ampicillin; Imi, imipenem; Mer, meropenem; r, resistant; s, susceptible; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

b

Strains isolated in Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.

c

Strains isolated in the Hospital of China Medical University, Taiwan, Republic of China.

d

All of these strains were Ampr, but only 25 of them were ESBL strains.