Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 2;189(7):2844–2853. doi: 10.1128/JB.01713-06

TABLE 3.

Results of gene disruption recombineering applied to antitermination and ribosome-associated protein genes

Gene Recombination efficiencya Gene configurationb Gene essentiality
nusA 1.8 × 101 nusA<>cat/nusA+ Essential
nusBc 0.9 × 101 nusB<>cat/nusB+ NAe
6.5 × 103 nusB<>cat Growth impaired
nusD/rho 3.7 × 102 nusD<>kan/nusD+ Essential
rhoL-nusD/rho 2.7 × 102 nusD<>kan/nusD+ Essential
rhoL-nusD/rhod 4.2 × 102 nusD<>kanSD/nusD+ Essential
nusE(rpsJ) 0.7 × 101 nusE<>kan/nusE+ Essential
nusG 1.2 × 101 nusG<>cat/nusG+ Essential
yfiA 7.3 × 104 yfiA<>kan Nonessential
yhbH 6.6 × 104 yhbH<>cat Nonessential
rmf 3.2 × 104 rmf<>amp Nonessential
rpsV 8.5 × 104 rpsV<>kan Nonessential
a

Number of antibiotic-resistant DY330 recombinants per 5 × 108 viable cells.

b

Determined by PCR analysis of the chromosomal region with the replaced gene, as shown in Fig. 3. Partial diploids are shown as gene<>antibiotic-resistance cassette/gene+.

c

Two gene knockout patterns were observed for nusB knockouts. Cells with a diploid gene configuration appeared with a low frequency on the first day. After 2 days, they were followed by numerous nusB<>cat recombinants.

d

rhoL-rho was replaced with kan containing its own Shine-Dalgarno sequence, kanSD.

e

NA, not applicable.