TABLE 3.
Gene | Recombination efficiencya | Gene configurationb | Gene essentiality |
---|---|---|---|
nusA | 1.8 × 101 | nusA<>cat/nusA+ | Essential |
nusBc | 0.9 × 101 | nusB<>cat/nusB+ | NAe |
6.5 × 103 | nusB<>cat | Growth impaired | |
nusD/rho | 3.7 × 102 | nusD<>kan/nusD+ | Essential |
rhoL-nusD/rho | 2.7 × 102 | nusD<>kan/nusD+ | Essential |
rhoL-nusD/rhod | 4.2 × 102 | nusD<>kanSD/nusD+ | Essential |
nusE(rpsJ) | 0.7 × 101 | nusE<>kan/nusE+ | Essential |
nusG | 1.2 × 101 | nusG<>cat/nusG+ | Essential |
yfiA | 7.3 × 104 | yfiA<>kan | Nonessential |
yhbH | 6.6 × 104 | yhbH<>cat | Nonessential |
rmf | 3.2 × 104 | rmf<>amp | Nonessential |
rpsV | 8.5 × 104 | rpsV<>kan | Nonessential |
Number of antibiotic-resistant DY330 recombinants per 5 × 108 viable cells.
Determined by PCR analysis of the chromosomal region with the replaced gene, as shown in Fig. 3. Partial diploids are shown as gene<>antibiotic-resistance cassette/gene+.
Two gene knockout patterns were observed for nusB knockouts. Cells with a diploid gene configuration appeared with a low frequency on the first day. After 2 days, they were followed by numerous nusB<>cat recombinants.
rhoL-rho was replaced with kan containing its own Shine-Dalgarno sequence, kanSD.
NA, not applicable.