Skip to main content
. 2007 May 9;2(5):e436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000436

Table 1. Sequence profiles of TaqI-RE-digestion-resistant mutant SDHB clones.

Nucleic acid source (n = number of samples) Nucleic acid type/PCR method No. of clones TTGA R46X No. of clones TCGG No. of clones TCAA No. of clones CCGA No. of clones ACGA No. of clones TAGA No. of clones TCGT Single clones Total no. of clones P for enrichment of TTGA clones&
PBMC (n = 6) cDNA/RT-PCR 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 TTGG 93 ∼0
Pure Monocytes (n = 1) cDNA/RT-PCR 32 2 0 2 0 0 0 TGGA 37 ∼0
T-ALL primary (n = 3) cDNA/RT-PCR 75 13 4 5 0 0 0 TGGA 98 ∼0
T-ALL cell lines* cDNA/RT-ePCR 27 7 6 9 3 0 1 ATAG 54 2.2×10−4
NK-92 (NK cell) cDNA/RT-ePCR 2 1 2 10 8 0 3 0 26 0.33
Pfeiffer (B cell) cDNA/RT-ePCR 2 2 0 16 0 0 3 0 23 0.33
THP-1 (Monocyte) cDNA/RT-ePCR 9 10 13 14 4 3 1 TCACTCTA 56 0.60
PBMC (n = 3) gDNA/ePCR 27 0 0 0 0 2 0 TGGA 30 ∼0
T-ALL cell linesˆ gDNA/ePCR 43 0 1 3 0 6 0 TCTA 54 ∼0
*

Includes Jurkat, Loucy, SUP-T1, HuT 78.

ˆ

Includes MOLT-4 and Jurkat.

&

Fisher's exact test of the hypotheses that number of TTGA clones should be ∼16% of the total on the basis of random somatic mutation data [15].