Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 9;66(4):464–469. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.060277

Table 3 Cross‐sectional (on baseline measurements) and longitudinal (on baseline–M12 changes measurements) interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities of the four scoring methods, using intra‐class coefficient of correlation and the Bland–Altman approach.

Scoring method Inter‐reader Reproducibility ICC on M0–M12 change (95% CI) reading 1, (%) Reader Intra‐reader Reproducibility ICC on M0–M12 change (95% CI) reading 1, (%)
ICC on baseline scorings (95% CI), (%) Smallest detectable difference ICC on baseline scorings (95% CI), (%) Smallest detectable difference
Global score 0.859 (0.819 to 0.899) 19.8 0.999 (0.998 to 1) Obs 1 0.922 (0.899 to 0.945) 20.6 0.939 (0.921 to 0.957)
Obs 2 0.961 (0.949 to 0.973) 13.6 0.956 (0.943 to 0.969)
Kellgren–Lawrence 0.951 (0.936 to 0.966) 14.2 0.998 (0.997 to 0.999) Obs 1 0.988 (0.984 to 0.992) 10.2 0.990 (0.980 to 1.000)
Obs 2 0.991 (0.988 to 0.994) 6.6 0.998 (0.997 to 0.999)
Kallman 0.706 (0.631 to 0.781) 8.8 0.995 (0.993 to 0.997) Obs 1 0.962 (0.950 to 0.974) 7.8 0.986 (0.982 to 0.990)
Obs 2 0.999 (0.998 to 1.000) 6.8 0.959 (0.947 to 0.971)
Verbruggen 0.996 (0.994 to 0.998) 13.4 0.998 (0.997 to 0.999) Obs 1 0.999 (0.998 to 1.000) 4 0.941 (0.922 to 0.958)
Obs 2 0.999 (0.998 to 1.000) 5.2 0.988 (0.984 to 0.992)

ICC, intra‐class coefficient of correlation; M, month; SDD, smallest detectable difference.

SDD was obtained from twice the SD of the mean of the differences.