Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul;90(7):894–899. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.086314

Table 3 Comparison of p16INK4a between CINs and SILs.

Case p16INK4a positive rate (%) p Value
CIN lesion (n = 9) 0/9 (0) <0.00001
HSIL (n = 9) 9/9 (100)
CIN lesion (n = 9) 0/9 (0) 0.003
LSIL (n = 10) 7/10 (70)
CIN lesion (n = 9) 0/9 (0) <0.00001
SIL (HSIL+LSIL) (n = 19) 16/19(84.21)