. 2006 Dec;90(12):1454–1457. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.099143

Table 2 Discharged patients.

Patient	Family history	Suspect disc	IOP on presentation*		IOP on review*		VF defect on presentation	VF defect on review	NFI		Statistically significant IES‡	Oral atenolol
Patient	Family history	Suspect disc	R	L	R	L	VF defect on presentation	VF defect on review	R	L	Statistically significant IES‡	Oral atenolol
1	+	+	16	20	16	18			22	20
2		+	20	20	16	16	+	+^†	20	15
3	+	+	18	18	20	20			3	18
4	+	+	16	20	13	14			13	12
5		+	20	21	20	21			9	15
6		+	21	20	21	20			37	23
7	+	+	17	17	16	16			27	22
8		+	20	18	20	18			9	8	+
9	+	+	14	18	14	18			28	18	+	+
10	+	+	19	20	20	19			12	18		+
11	+	+	14	12	14	12			18	20
12		+	14	22	14	14	+		22	22
13		+	18	18	18	18			24	38
14	+	+	20	20	19	19	+	+^†	25	17	+
15		+	18	18	16	16			21	26
16		+	21	21	21	21			17	17	+
17	+		16	18	14	14	+		23	26

IES, inter‐eye symmetry; IOP, intraocular pressure; L, left; NFI, nerve fibre index; R, right; VF, visual field.

^*Corrected for central corneal thickness.

^†Unreliable visual fields on standard automated perimetry.

‡Measure based on the degree of symmetry between the right and left eyes by correlating the temporal‐superior‐nasal‐inferior‐temporal functions from the two eyes. Significant in the event of inter‐eye asymmetry.