Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 3;103(46):17302–17307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603125103

Table 2.

Tests of positive selection among abalone ZP genes

Gene One ratio model (M0) Neutral model (M8a) Selection model (M8) 2 Δ lnL (M8a-vs-M8)
VERL ω0 = 0.5 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.55 ω0 = 2.34, pO = 0.14 0.70
(C terminus only)
VEZP2 ω0 = 0.20 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.10 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.10 0
VEZP3 ω0 = 0.60 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.48 ω0 = 3.7, pO = 0.08 6.24*
VEZP4 ω0 = 0.40 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.40 ω0 = 3.5, pO = 0.11 5.86*
VEZP5 ω0 = 1.06 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.56 ω0 = 10.16, pO = 0.07 28.64**
VEZP6 ω0 = 0.17 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.51 ω0 = 21.34, pO = 0.01 6.20*
VEZP7 ω0 = 0.57 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.46 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.46 0
VEZP8 ω0 = 0.45 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.00 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.00 0
VEZP9 ω0 = 1.11 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.80 ω0 = 10.06, pO = 0.04 9.22*
VEZP10 ω0 = 0.11 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.10 ω0 = 10.74, pO = 0.01 7.96*
ZPA ω0 = 0.17 ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.16 ω0 = 1.74, pO = 0.11 1.12

Codon substitution models (46, 47) were used to analyze sequences from four abalone taxa (H. corrugata, H. rufescens, H. fulgens, and H. discus hannai). Sites models allowing for a single ω across sites (M0), as well as several neutral models (M1a, M7, and M8a) or selection models (M2a and M8) allowing for variation in ω among sites, were fit to the data using PAML (40). Despite low power of M0 to detect positive selection, two VE proteins (VEZP5 and VEZP9) show evidence of ω > 1 consistent with adaptive divergence among species. More powerful tests employing likelihood ratio tests comparing neutral and selection models (e.g., M8a-vs-M8) identify four additional VE proteins under positive selection (VEZP3, VEZP4, VEZP6, and VEZP10). Estimates of ω, the proportion of codons in this positively selected site class (ω 0 and p0, respectively), and the likelihood ratio test statistic (LRT, 2 Δ lnL) are given. ∗, significant at P ≤ 0.05; ∗∗, significant at P ≤ 0.005.