Table 2.
Gene | One ratio model (M0) | Neutral model (M8a) | Selection model (M8) | 2 Δ lnL (M8a-vs-M8) |
---|---|---|---|---|
VERL | ω0 = 0.5 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.55 | ω0 = 2.34, pO = 0.14 | 0.70 |
(C terminus only) | ||||
VEZP2 | ω0 = 0.20 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.10 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.10 | 0 |
VEZP3 | ω0 = 0.60 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.48 | ω0 = 3.7, pO = 0.08 | 6.24* |
VEZP4 | ω0 = 0.40 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.40 | ω0 = 3.5, pO = 0.11 | 5.86* |
VEZP5 | ω0 = 1.06 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.56 | ω0 = 10.16, pO = 0.07 | 28.64** |
VEZP6 | ω0 = 0.17 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.51 | ω0 = 21.34, pO = 0.01 | 6.20* |
VEZP7 | ω0 = 0.57 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.46 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.46 | 0 |
VEZP8 | ω0 = 0.45 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.00 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.00 | 0 |
VEZP9 | ω0 = 1.11 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.80 | ω0 = 10.06, pO = 0.04 | 9.22* |
VEZP10 | ω0 = 0.11 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.10 | ω0 = 10.74, pO = 0.01 | 7.96* |
ZPA | ω0 = 0.17 | ω0 = 1.00, pO = 0.16 | ω0 = 1.74, pO = 0.11 | 1.12 |
Codon substitution models (46, 47) were used to analyze sequences from four abalone taxa (H. corrugata, H. rufescens, H. fulgens, and H. discus hannai). Sites models allowing for a single ω across sites (M0), as well as several neutral models (M1a, M7, and M8a) or selection models (M2a and M8) allowing for variation in ω among sites, were fit to the data using PAML (40). Despite low power of M0 to detect positive selection, two VE proteins (VEZP5 and VEZP9) show evidence of ω > 1 consistent with adaptive divergence among species. More powerful tests employing likelihood ratio tests comparing neutral and selection models (e.g., M8a-vs-M8) identify four additional VE proteins under positive selection (VEZP3, VEZP4, VEZP6, and VEZP10). Estimates of ω, the proportion of codons in this positively selected site class (ω 0 and p0, respectively), and the likelihood ratio test statistic (LRT, 2 Δ lnL) are given. ∗, significant at P ≤ 0.05; ∗∗, significant at P ≤ 0.005.