Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov;55(11):1650–1660. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.091454

Table 1 Characteristics of studies evaluating non‐invasive markers of fibrosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Study Total No of patients Patient selection Prevalence of S, I, and F* Age mean (median) % male BMI mean (median) Alcohol % diabetes or hypertension Liver biopsy score† Non‐invasive variables
Angulo 1999 USA11 144 NAFLD on biopsy and persistently abnormal LFTS for more than 3 months. Prospective and retrospective recruitment 73% grade 2–3 (S) 27% significant fibrosis (F3/4) (50.5) 33 31.2 <40 g/week 28% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (n/s) Age, AST/ALT >1, ALT, albumin, transferrin saturation, diabetes
Rosenberg 2004 Europe12 61 NAFLD on biopsy and abnormal LFTS for 6 months. Prospective recruitment 27% significant fibrosis (F3/4) 44 63 n/s n/s n/s Sheuer L (>12 mm), PT (>5), O (3) Age, HA, PIIINP, TIMP‐1
Sakuguwa 2005 Japan13 112 NAFLD on biopsy 63% NASH 43% significant fibrosis (F3/4) 51 32 29 <30 g/day 30% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (2) Female, platelets, albumin, GGT, AST/ALT, HA, type IV collagen
Albano 2005 UK14 167 (NAFLD) 59 (controls) NAFLD on biopsy Case controlled: NAFLD v controls. Prospective consecutive recruitment 44% NASH 17% significant fibrosis (F3/4) 55 61 35 <20 g/day 29% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, AST/ALT >1, diabetes, MDA
Mofrad 2003 USA15 51 NAFLD on biopsy with normal ALT 72% grade 2–3 (S) 36% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 53 31 29 <20 g/day 57% diabetes 47%hypertension Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Diabetes
Shimada 2002 Japan16 81 NASH on biopsy Prospective recruitment 82% grade 2/3 (S) 100% NASH 28% severe fibrosis (F3/4) (54) 49 (26) <20 g/week 31% diabetes Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, platelet count, AST/ALT >1, albumin, bilirubin, ferritin, platelets, IgA, PT, type IV collagen, raised lipids
Dixon 2001 Australia17 105 Patients undergoing laparoscopic banding and liver biopsy with BMI >35. Prospective consecutive recruitment 25% NASH. 10% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 41 21 47 <200 g/wk 18% diabetes 39% hypertension Brunt L (n/s), PT (>6), O (1) Male, diabetes, hypertension, ALT, C peptide
Beymer 2003 USA18 48 BMI >35 undergoing gastric bypass surgery and liver biopsy Prospective consecutive recruitment 64% grade 2/3 (S) 33% NASH 12% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 42 31 60 <20 g/mth 19% diabetes Ishak, L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Diabetes
Bugianesi 2004 Italy19 167 Raised transaminases (>6 months) and bright liver on U/S and NAFLD on biopsy. Prospective recruitment 47% grade 2/3 (S) 21% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 41 83 28 <20 g/day 8% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (n/s) Age, female, BMI, AST/ALT, Ferritin, OGIS, 1/QUICKI, HOMA‐IR (insulin sensitivity indices‐ see table 2)
Dixon 2003 Australia20 105 Patients with BMI >35 undergoing laparoscopic banding and liver biopsy Prospective recruitment 34% NASH 14% severe fibrosis (F 3/4) 42 26 >35 <200 g/wk n/s Brunt L (n/s), PT (>6), O (1) ALT, HOMA‐IR, polymorphisms in TGF factor and angiotensinogen
Hui 2004 Australia21 109 (NAFLD) 82 (controls) Patients referred with abnormal LFTS or hepatic steatosis on U/S and NAFLD on biopsy. Controls matched by age and BMI. Case controlled/ prospective 50% grade 2/3 (S) 73% NASH 28% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 48 63 30 <40 g/wk 32% diabetes in NAFLD group Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, HOMA‐IR
Guidorizzi de Siqueira 2005 Brazil22 64 Patients with NAFLD on biopsy. Prospective recruitment 84% NASH 11% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 45 78 28 <20 g/day 11% diabetes 27% hypertension Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) HOMA‐IR
Suzuki 2005 USA23 79 Patients with abnormal LFTs for three months and NAFLD on liver biopsy Prospective and consecutive recruitment 25% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 46 38 33 <40 g/wk n/s Brunt L (>15 mm), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, serum albumin, platelet count, fasting blood glucose, HA, clinical diagnostic score
Angulo 2004 USA24 88 Patients with abnormal LFTS, NAFLD on biopsy and participants in previous trials. Retrospective recruitment 77% grade 2–3 (S) 83% NASH 22% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 45 35 33 <140 g/wk 19% diabetes Brunt L (>15 mm), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, female, BMI, diabetes, leptin, QUICKI, HOMA‐IR
Marchesini 2003 Italy25 163 Patients with abnormal LFTS for 3 months and NAFLD on liver biopsy. Prospective consecutive recruitment 74% NASH 21% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 40 88 28 <140 g/wk 67% hypertension Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (n/s) Metabolic syndrome
Hashimoto 2005 Japan26 247 Patients with NAFLD on liver biopsy Prospective recruitment 36% severe fibrosis (F3/4) (53) 53 67% with BMI >28 <100 g/wk 33% diabetes 46% hypertension Local score Age, sexAST/ALT, albumin, platelets, diabetes, HA, and type IV collagen.
Ong 2005 USA27 212 Patients undergoing bariatric surgery with BMI >40 and obesity related complications. Prospective recruitment 24% NASH 8% advanced fibrosis 42 20 48 <10 g/day 24% diabetes Local score L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) WHR, AST, ALT, diabetes, HT
Ledinghen 200428 67 Chronically elevated ALT for six months and liver biopsy Retrospective recruitment 40% NASH 31% F2/3/4 fibrosis 47 67 26 <40 g/day n/s Metavir L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) BMI, AST, ALT, ferritin
Ratziu 2000 France29 93 BMI >25, abnormal LFTS and NASH on liver biopsy. Retrospective consecutive recruitment 30% F2/3/4 fibrosis 49 34 29 30 g/day 16% diabetes Metavir L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, BMI, ALT, diabetes, TG
Sorrentino 2004 Italy30 80 Undergoing liver biopsy for operative procedure (gall stones, large bowel or gastric cancer) + metabolic syndrome + high grade obesity + normal LFTS. Prospective recruitment 53% grade 2/3 (S) 73% NASH 23% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 58 38 39 <30 g/day 45% diabetes 78% hypertension Brunt L (>8 mm), PT (n/s), O (2) Female, BMI >45, duration of obesity, metabolic syndrome
Crespo 2001 Spain31 181 Patients undergoing bariatric surgery and liver biopsy. Prospective recruitment 72% grade 2/3 (S) 23% F2/3/4 fibrosis n/s 16 47 <30 g/day n/s Modified Metavir L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Age at liver biopsy, elevated blood sugar level
Fierbinteanu‐ Braticevici 2002 Romania32 80 Abnormal LFTS and fatty liver on ultrasound and undergoing liver biopsy Retrospective recruitment 26% NASH 51 25 32 <200 g/wk n/s Local score L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) Age, BMI >30, ALT >3 N, ferritin, TG, MDA, GSH
Loguercio 2004 Italy33 305 Abnormal ALT for 12 months and NAFLD on liver biopsy. Prospective recruitment 68% grade 2/3 (S) Moderate/severe pericellular fibrosis n/a 82 70% were >25 <20 g/day n/s Local score L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (3) Ferritin, HOMA‐IR
dos Santos 2005 Brazil34 30 BMI >25 + ultrasound diagnosis of steatosis + raised LFTs and undergoing liver biopsy. Prospective recruitment Fibrosis present in 37% 45 60 31 <20 g/day 23% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (n/s) AST, laminin, HA, collagen IV
Yesilova 2005 Turkey35 51 (NAFLD) 30 (controls) Raised LFTS for 6 months and NAFLD on liver biopsy Prospective recruitment 60% grade 2/3 (S) 88% NASH 10% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 36 100 28 <20 g/day 0% diabetes Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (n/s) HOMA‐IR, CoQ10, Cu ZnSOD
Koruk 200336 36 (NASH) 32 (controls) Steatosis on ultrasound, abnormal LFTs for 3 months and NASH on liver biopsy 67% Grade 2/3 (S) 100% NASH 0% severe fibrosis (F3/4) 44 75 (29) Absent 20% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (n/s) TG, LDL cholesterol, Apo A1
Hartleb 200537 47 Patients with NAFLD on liver biopsy and ALT >1.5 ULN. Retrospective study 50% Grade 2/3 (S) 65% NASH 20% some fibrosis 45 57 29 <120 g/wk 13% diabetes Local L (n/s), PT (>5), O (2) Age, BMI, diabetes, hypertension
Chitturi 2002 Australia38 94 NASH Case‐controlled – prospective and retrospective 70% Grade 2/3 (S) 45% significant fibrosis (F3/4) 51 57 31 <20 g/d 47% diabetes Modified Brunt L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) None
Brunt 2004 USA39 30 Subjects in NASH treatment trial. Retrospective 43% grade1–4 fibrosis 45 46 34 <20 g/day 25% diabetes Brunt and Metavir L (n/s), PT (n/s), O (1) AST/ALT ratio, albumin

*S, steatosis; I, inflammation; F, fibrosis.

†L, length; PT, portal tract; O, observers.

NASH, non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis; LFTs, liver function tests; MDA, malondialdehyde; TG, triglycerides; BMI, body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GSH, glutathione; TGF, transforming growth factor; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HA, hyaluronic acid; TIMP‐1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; PIIINP, aminoterminal peptide of procollagen III; GGT, gamma glutamyl transferase; Apo A1, apoprotein A1; ULN, upper limit of normal; CoQ10, coenzyme Q10; Cu ZnSOD, copper zinc oxide dismutase; WHR, waist to hip ratio; HOMA‐IR, homeostatic insulin resistance; QUICKI, quantitiative insulin sensitivity check index.