Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov;55(11):1598–1605. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.083063

Table 2 Comparison of clinicopathological factors for patients with K‐ras mutation negative and positive margins.

Clinicopathological factor K‐ras mutation in margin *p Value
Negative (n = 33) Positive (n = 37)
Age (y) 0.075
 Mean (SD) 65 (9) 69 (11)
Sex 1.0
 Female 17 (52%) 18 (49%)
 Male 16 (48%) 19 (51%)
UICC/TNM stage† 0.33
 pI‡ 10 (30%) 16 (43%)
 pII‡ 23 (70%) 21 (57%)
Primary tumour 0.17
 T1 11 (33%) 5 (14%)
 T2 19 (58%) 27 (72%)
 T3 3 (9%) 5 (14%)
Lymph node metastasis 0.15
 N0 11 (33%) 19 (51%)
 N1 22 (67%) 18 (49%)
Tumour size (cm) 0.20
 0–2 12 (36%) 8 (22%)
 >2 21 (64%) 29 (78%)
Pathological grade 0.037
 Well 3 (9%) 8 (22%)
 Moderate 21 (64%) 12 (32%)
 Poor 9 (27%) 17 (46%)
Perineural invasion 0.024
 Absent 16 (48%) 8 (22%)
 Present 17 (52%) 29 (78%)
Lymphovascular invasion 0.027
 Absent 29 (88%) 23 (62%)
 Present 4 (12%) 14 (38%)
PanIN in margin¶ 1.0
 Absent 1 (7%) 2 (12.5%)
 Present 13 (93%) 14 (87.5%
 1 9 8
 2–3 4 6
K‐ras mutation in tumour 0.36
 Absent 8 25
 Present 5 32

*Comparison for age was performed by the Student's t test; the remaining clinical factors were compared by Fisher's exact test.

†UICC/TNM 6th edition.

‡pI and pII, pathological stage I and pathological stage II.

¶For patients with available pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia data.