Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;90(6):686–689. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.079533

Table 2 Summary of significant characteristics associated with perforated corneal ulcers.

Factors Proportion (%)
Cases Controls OR (95% CI) p Value
Outdoor occupation 32/60 (53) 16/60 (27) 3.1 (1.5 to 6.7) 0.005
Illiteracy 25/60 (42) 12/60 (20) 2.9 (1.3 to 6.4) 0.02
Excessive alcohol use 20/60 (33) 9/60 (15) 2.8 (1.2 to 6.7) 0.03
History of “something falling into eye” 38/60 (63) 21/60 (35) 3.2 (1.5 to 6.7) 0.003
Trauma with vegetable matter 29/60 (48) 14/60 (23) 3.1 (1.4 to 6.7) 0.008
Visual acuity less than counting fingers* 59/60 (98) 10/60 (17) 295.0 (44.9 to 1842.6) <0.001
Central location of ulcer* 41/60 (68) 14/60(23) 7.1 (3.2 to 15.8) <0.001
Lack of corneal vascularisation* 41/60 (68) 17/60 (28) 5.2 (2.5 to 11.9) <0.001
Delay in starting initial treatment 46/60 (77) 8/60 (13) 21.4 (8.3 to 54.8) <0.001
Failure to start fortified antibiotics 34/41 (83) 8/29 (28) 12.8 (4.1 to 39.7) <0.001
Monotherapy with fluoroquinolones 28/41 (68) 8/29 (28) 5.7 (2.0 to 15.9) 0.002

OR, univariate odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals.

*Ulcer characteristics at referral or from available previous records.

Risk factors in bold retained association after multiple logistic regression.