Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1983 Feb;23(2):245–247. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.2.245

Synergistic Effect of N-Formimidoyl Thienamycin with Gentamicin and Amikacin Against Streptococcus faecalis

Myles E Gombert 1, Leonard B Berkowitz 1, Marinella C Cummings 1
PMCID: PMC186030  PMID: 6404218

Abstract

The in vitro activities of N-formimidoyl thienamycin alone and in combination with amikacin and gentamicin were tested against 10 strains of Streptococcus faecalis. Synergy was demonstrated in 35% of the combinations tested by the microtiter checkerboard technique; 50% were found to be synergistic with time killing curves.

Full text

PDF
245

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auckenthaler R., Wilson W. R., Wright A. J., Washington J. A., 2nd, Durack D. T., Geraci J. E. Lack of in vivo and in vitro bactericidal activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin against enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Sep;22(3):448–452. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.3.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gavan T. L., Town M. A. A microdilution method for antibiotic susceptibility testing: an evaluation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970 Jun;53(6):880–885. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/53.6.880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kesado T., Hashizume T., Asahi Y. Antibacterial activities of a new stabilized thienamycin, N-formimidoyl thienamycin, in comparison with other antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jun;17(6):912–917. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.6.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Livingston W. K., Elliott A. M., Cobbs C. G. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, and Enterococcus spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):114–116. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neu H. C., Labthavikul P. Comparative in vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic species and its beta-lactamase stability. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jan;21(1):180–187. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.1.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Toala P., McDonald A., Wilcox C., Finland M. Susceptibility of group D streptococcus (enterococcus) to 21 antibiotics in vitro, with special reference to species differences. Am J Med Sci. 1969 Dec;258(6):416–430. doi: 10.1097/00000441-196912000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tutlane V. A., McCloskey R. V., Trent J. A. In vitro comparison of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, and cefoperazone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jul;20(1):140–143. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.1.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Verbist L., Verhaegen J. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin in comparison with cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Mar;19(3):402–406. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES