Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 26;92(5):650–657. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.070698

Table 1 Characteristics of randomised trials comparing drug eluting stents with bare metal stents.

Study Diabetes mellitus Mean age at baseline (years) Women (%) Hypertension (%) Dyslipidaemia (%) Smoking (%) Mean follow up (months)
Yes No Angiographic Clinical
Sirolimus eluting stents
SIRIUS (2003)4 279 778 62.3 29.0 68.0 74.0 20.0 8 9
E‐SIRIUS (2003)1 81 271 62.3 29.3 64.0 74.0 33.0 8 9
C‐SIRIUS (2004)3 24 76 60.5 31.0 52.0 85.0 37.0 8 9
DIABETES (2005)30 160 66.6 37.5 66.3 61.3 47.5 9 9
RAVEL (2002)2 44 194 60.7 24.0 61.0 40.0 30.0 6 12
SES‐SMART (2004)8 64 193 63.6 28.4 64.7 63.0 16.3 8 8
Paclitaxel eluting stents
TAXUS I (2003)5 11 49 64.9 11.4 63.9 80.3 50.8 6 12
TAXUS II (2003)6, 32, 33 76 453 60.1 24.4 61.5 76.6 24.8 6 24
TAXUS IV (2004)7, 29 318 996 62.5 27.9 69.8 65.3 21.8 9 24
TAXUS VI (2005)31 89 357 62.6 23.7 57.8 71.9 NA 9 12

C‐SIRIUS, Canadian sirolimus coated balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions; DIABETES, diabetes and sirolimus eluting stent trial; E‐SIRIUS, European sirolimus coated balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions; NA, not available; RAVEL, randomised study with the sirolimus eluting velocity balloon expandable stent; SES‐SMART, randomised comparison of a sirolimus eluting stent and a standard stent in the prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries; SIRIUS, sirolimus coated balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.