Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 14;92(11):1673–1677. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.086579

Table 1 Patients with transposition of the great arteries after atrial switch operation: characteristics and results.

Patient Sex Type of OP Age at OP (years) Age at study (years) RVEF (%) Segments with abnormal wall motion* Rhythm TR Mode of identification of scars
PET DE‐MRI
1 M Mus 5.2 35.2 49 5 SSS I ND Negative
2 F S 0.8 25.8 59 6 SR 0 Negative Negative
3 M Mus 1.9 26.9 63 5 SR I Negative Negative
4 M S 0.1 20.5 20 13 SR II Negative Negative
5 M S 0.1 18.5 60 5 SR I Negative Negative
6 M S 0.1 20.3 44 6 SSS I Negative Negative
7 M Mus 1.6 28.2 49 6 SR I Negative Negative
8 F S 1.7 23.7 45 13 SR III ND Negative
9 M S 0.5 16.5 55 9 SSS II Negative Negative
10 M S 1.0 16.1 66 6 SSS I ND Negative
11 F Mus 0.0 27.2 63 7 SR I Negative Negative
12 M S 1.1 26.2 39 4 SR II Negative Negative
13 M S 1.2 17.6 47 5 SR I Negative Negative
14 F S 0.9 24.4 71 3 SR I ND Negative
15 M S 0.2 18.1 38 5 SSS I Negative Negative
16 F Mus 3.1 30.2 33 6 SR I Negative Negative
17 F S 0.1 19.2 52 5 SSS I Negative Negative
18 M Mus 1.8 19.8 37 4 SR I Negative Negative
Mean (SD) 1.2 (1.3) 23.4 (5.3) 50 (13) 6 (2.8)
Median (range) 0.9 (0.0–5.2) 22.3 (16.1–35.2) 49 (20–71) 6 (3–13)

*Number of segments with abnormal wall motion of 13 analysed segments.

DE‐MRI, delayed‐enhancement magnetic resonance imaging; F, female; M, male; Mus, Mustard operation; ND, not done; OP, heart surgery; PET, positron emission tomography; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction determined by magnetic resonance imaging; S, Senning operation; SR, sinus rhythm; SSS, sick sinus syndrome; TR, grade of tricuspid regurgitation determined by echocardiography.25

None of the patients with relatively small RVEF or with many segments with wall motion abnormalities had myocardial scars.