Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar;93(3):363–364. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.093518

Table 1 Comparison of patients with rheumatic heart disease with tricuspid valve stenosis, without tricuspid valve stenosis, and controls.

Rheumatic HD TV with stenosis (n  =  5) Rheumatic HD TV without stenosis (n  =  8) Controls (n  = 13)
Male sex, n (%) 4 (80) 5 (63) 8 (62)
Age (years) 33 (7) 35 (4) 31 (6)
TV‐LS2D (mm) 11.8 (2.9) 12 (4.8) 15 (3.3)
TVA3D (mm2) 216 (61)* 381 (92) 518 (207)
3D commissural width (mm) 2.6 (0.2)* 4.1 (0.5) 5.9 (1.6)

2D, two dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; HD, heart disease; LS, leaflet separation; TV, tricuspid valve; TVA, tricuspid valve area.

Values are represented as mean (SD) unless otherwise specified.

*p<0.005 versus patients with rheumatic HD without significant TV involvement and p<0.001 versus controls.