Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Oct 12;52(1):90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.07.003

Western immunoblots were run on cell wall extracts of the same isolates tested by ELISA. The blots were developed using antisera against S. mitis biovar 1 strains NCTC 12261^T (Figure 2A) and SK 145 (Figure 2B). Antisera to S. oralis strains ATCC 35037^T and SK100 were non-reactive in Western blotting. Digital images of the blot strips were compared by cluster analysis using UPGMA. To the right of the strips is shown the identity of the isolate and its phenotype.

Western immunoblots were run on cell wall extracts of the same isolates tested by ELISA. The blots were developed using antisera against S. mitis biovar 1 strains NCTC 12261^T (Figure 2A) and SK 145 (Figure 2B). Antisera to S. oralis strains ATCC 35037^T and SK100 were non-reactive in Western blotting. Digital images of the blot strips were compared by cluster analysis using UPGMA. To the right of the strips is shown the identity of the isolate and its phenotype.