Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2005 May 1;65(9):3883–3893. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3757

Table 1.

Analysis of in vivo microtubule dynamics in the presence and absence of lonafarnib

Parameter Control Lonafarnib 10 − mol/L Percent change
Growth
 Rate (− m/min) 11.2 ± 2.1 7.7 ± 3.8 −31%
 Length (− m) 2.9 ± 1.6 1.9 ± 0.9 −34%
 Time (min) 0.3 ± 0.08 0.28 ± 0.07 −7%
Shortening
 Rate (− m/min) 17.1 ± 4.0 9.9 ± 3.3 −41%
 Length (− m) 5.3 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 1.6 −42%
 Time (min) 0.34 ± 0.11 0.33 ± 0.1 −3%
Pause
 Time (min) 0.36 ± 0.23 0.40 ± 0.2 −11%
Percentage time spent
 Growth 30 17
 Shortening 17 8.8
 Pause 53 74.2
Dynamicity (− m/min) 8.1 ± 4.0 3.0 ± 1.9 −63%
Rescue frequency (events/min) 4.1 ± 2.6 4.0 ± 2.5 −2%
Catastrophe frequency (events/min) 0.9 ± 0.8 0.88 ± 0.75 −2%
Rescue frequency (events/− m) 0.19 ± 0.15 0.25 ± 0.21 31%
Catastrophe frequency (events/− m) 0.33 ± 0.29 0.37 ± 0.31 12%
Number of cells 21 23
Number of microtubules 81 69

NOTE: Values in boldface differ significantly from control values at >99% confidence interval as determined by Student’st test. Values are mean ± SD.