Table 2.
Distractor SOA
|
||
---|---|---|
Tone SOA and distractor relatedness | 0 ms | 100 ms |
Picture-naming | ||
50 ms | ||
Conceptual | 0.31 | 0.29 |
Phonological | 0.06 | 0.15 |
Unrelated | 0.13 | 0.00 |
150 ms | ||
Conceptual | 0.29 | 0.23 |
Phonological | 0.08 | 0.00 |
Unrelated | 0.08 | 0.06 |
900 ms | ||
Conceptual | 0.21 | 0.27 |
Phonological | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Unrelated | 0.04 | 0.15 |
Tone-discrimination | ||
50 ms | ||
Conceptual | 0.92 | 0.92 |
Phonological | 0.94 | 0.77 |
Unrelated | 0.81 | 0.75 |
150 ms | ||
Conceptual | 1.10 | 0.81 |
Phonological | 0.96 | 0.81 |
Unrelated | 0.73 | 0.69 |
900 ms | ||
Conceptual | 0.58 | 0.92 |
Phonological | 0.63 | 0.69 |
Unrelated | 0.52 | 0.83 |
Note. The three-way interaction had a 95% confidence-interval halfwidth of 0.18 errors per subject for picture-naming and 0.33 errors per subject for tone-discrimination.