Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 30;579(Pt 1):215–225. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.118190

Table 1.

Ventilatory responses to hypoxia: parameter values (mean ±s.e.m) for the model of the ventilatory response to acute hypoxia for the trimetaphan and control protocols before and after an 8 h period of sustained hypoxic exposure

Protocol/factor G100 (l min−1%−1) c(l min−1) Tp (s) Dp (s) Gh (l min−1%−2) Th (s) Kp (%)
AM measurements – before sustained hypoxia
 Control 1 0.85 ± 0.20 7.58 ± 1.51 11.77 ± 4.40 5.83 ± 147 0.028 ± 0.011 537 ± 135 3.48 ± 1.41
 Trimetaphan 0.78 ± 0.23 4.17 ± 1.28 9.09 ± 5.40 5.69 ± 1.17 0.022 ± 0.008 820 ± 136 10.64 ± 7.49
 Control 2 1.01 ± 0.20 7.45 ± 1.39 11.88 ± 4.21 6.12 ± 1.71 0.030 ± 0.010 643 ± 162 1.99 ± 1.62
PM measurements – after sustained hypoxia
 Control 1 1.82 ± 0.29 15.58 ± 1.28 20.97 ± 3.47 6.10 ± 2.19 0.054 ± 0.023 471 ± 115 1.54 ± 0.89
 Trimetaphan 1.40 ± 0.23 12.03 ± 2.95 12.17 ± 3.60 4.63 ± 0.91 0.045 ± 0.021 880 ± 114 2.77 ± 1.57
 Control 2 1.75 ± 0.15 16.61 ± 0.99 12.83 ± 3.96 2.74 ± 0.63 0.030 ± 0.020 594 ± 134 0.83 ± 0.77
Statistical analysis – ANOVA
 Time (before/after sustained hypoxia) < 0.001 < 0.001
Protocol (C1, C2 versus T)
 Interactive term

G100, steady-state chemoreflex sensitivity to hypoxia in absence of any hypoxic ventilatory depression (arterial oxygen saturation is 100%); E, hypoxia independent (central chemoreflex) contribution to c; Tp, time constant for the peripheral chemoreflex responses to hypoxia; Dp, time delay for the peripheral chemoreflex; Gh, sensitivity to hypoxic ventilatory decline, expressed as the ratio of the decrease in the sensitivity of the peripheral chemoreflex to the decrease in conditioning arterial oxygen saturation; Th, time constant associated with the development of hypoxic ventilatory decline; Kp, bias term, representing peripheral drive in absence of hypoxia; AM, morning; PM, afternoon. ANOVA conducted on the parameter values with fixed factors Time (before/after sustained hypoxia) and Protocol (control protocols (Protocols C1, C2) versus Protocol T). Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.