Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 30;579(Pt 1):215–225. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.118190

Table 2.

Pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia: parameter values (mean ±s.e.m.) for the model of the pulmonary vascular response to acute hypoxia for the trimetaphan and control protocols before and after an 8 h period of sustained hypoxic exposure

Protocol/factor GΔP (mmHg %−1) ΔP100 (mmHg) TΔP (min)
AM measurements – before sustained hypoxia
 Control 1 0.50 ± 0.06 18.9 ± 1.5 2.41 ± 0.41
 Trimetaphan 0.41 ± 0.04 17.4 ± 1.2 3.06 ± 0.32
 Control 2 0.58 ± 0.06 17.9 ± 1.2 3.24 ± 0.20
PM measurements – after sustained hypoxia
 Control 1 0.95 ± 0.10 22.2 ± 1.8 3.90 ± 0.64
 Trimetaphan 0.68 ± 0.07 21.2 ± 1.6 2.91 ± 0.35
 Control 2 0.82 ± 0.04 22.1 ± 1.4 3.61 ± 0.40
Statistical analysis – ANOVA
 Time (before/after sustained hypoxia) < 0.001 < 0.001
 Protocol (C1, C2 versus T) < 0.02 < 0.05
 Interactive term < 0.05

GΔP is the sensitivity of maximum pressure difference across tricuspid valve during systole (ΔPmax) to a decrease in saturation; ΔP100 is the steady-state value for ΔPmax in the absence of hypoxia (i.e. when saturation is 100%); TΔP is the time constant for the response; AM, morning; PM, afternoon. ANOVA conducted on the parameter values with fixed factors Time (before/after sustained hypoxia) and Protocol (control protocols (Protocols C1, C2) versus Protocol T). Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.