Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 14;45(5):1528–1534. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02344-06

TABLE 2.

Comparison of recombinant LigB-based immunoblot assay with standard diagnostic tests for leptospirosis

Phase of illness and time period after onset No. of samples tested Results for standard diagnostic evaluation
rLigB immunoblot (no. of positive reactions [%]) for:
Median maximum reciprocal MAT titer (range) No. of samples with reciprocal MAT titer of ≥100 (%) IgM ELISA (no. of positive reactions [%]) IgM IgG
Acute phase (n = 95)a
    2 to 6 days 21 0 (0-3,200) 7 (33) 11 (52) 17 (81) 13 (62)
    7 to 11 days 55 400 (0-6,400) 35 (64) 47 (85) 52 (94) 51 (93)
    12 to 23 days 19 800 (0-6,400) 15 (79) 14 (74) 18 (95) 17 (89)
Early convalescent phase (n = 95)a
    18 to 28 days 42 3,200 (800-25,600) 42 (100) 41 (98) 37 (88) 40 (95)
    29 to 36 days 33 1,600 (400-12,800) 33 (100) 32 (97) 25 (76) 33 (100)
    37 to 113 days 20 1,600 (200-6,400) 20 (100) 20 (100) 7 (35) 20 (100)
Late convalescent phase (n = 58)b
    4 to 23 mos 24 400 (0-800) 20 (83) 23 (96) 4 (17) 13 (54)
    24 to 47 mos 17 400 (100-1,600) 17 (100) 7 (41) 1 (6) 3 (18)
    48 to 72 mos 17 200 (200-800) 15 (88) 5 (29) 1 (6) 3 (18)
a

Paired samples were obtained from 95 leptospirosis cases (n) in Salvador, Brazil. Early-convalescent-phase samples were obtained more than 14 days and less than 4 months after collection of acute-phase samples.

b

Late-convalescent-phase samples were obtained from leptospirosis patients 4 months to 72 months after discharge from hospital.