Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 27;81(6):2805–2816. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02095-06

TABLE 2.

Comparison of M segment nucleotide identity differences among endemic versus epizootic/epidemic RVF virus strains

Strain no. Strain Nucleotide identity differences with strain no.a:
Endemic
Epidemic
Zimbabwe 1970-1978
CAR 1973-74
Mauritania 1987
Egypt 1977-1979
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1 763/70 4.7 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8
2 2250/74 4.1 4.3 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.3 2.3 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
3 2269/74 3.8 4.1 3.7 3.5 3.9 3.9 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1
4 2373/74 4.3 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3
5 1260/78 2.1 2.1 1.2 1.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5
6 1853/78 1.6 1.9 1.9 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3
7 73HB1230 1.8 1.8 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0
8 73HB1449 0.0 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4
9 74HB59 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4
10 OS1 0.2 0.3 0.2 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7
11 OS3 0.1 0.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.7
12 OS8 0.1 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.8
13 OS9 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.7
14 ZH501 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
15 ZH548 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
16 ZH1776 0.1 0.1 0.3
17 ZM657 0.1 0.3
18 ZS6365 0.3
19 ZC3349
a

The numbering of strains along the top of the table corresponds to the RVF strain numbers in the first column. Boldface numbers indicate differences among viruses that are within a given enzootic area or epizootic.