TABLE 2.
Sequencea | Diff −lnLb | Pc |
---|---|---|
Firstd | ||
168† | 67.635 | 0.000* |
197 | 85.935 | 0.000* |
214 | 28.094 | 0.006* |
258† | 108.153 | 0.000* |
259† | 68.407 | 0.000* |
260 | 2.656 | 0.344 |
MF14 | 29.355 | 0.005* |
PN17 | 72.269 | 0.000* |
PN21† | 35.537 | 0.002* |
PN22 | 62.599 | 0.000* |
PN23† | 66.752 | 0.000* |
Seconde | ||
168 | 31.741 | 0.006* |
197 | 51.234 | 0.000* |
214 | 117.730 | 0.000* |
258 | 31.743 | 0.002* |
259 | 25.720 | 0.035* |
260 | 40.658 | 0.000* |
MF14 | 116.522 | 0.000* |
PN17 | 23.612 | 0.047* |
PN21 | 61.732 | 0.000* |
PN22 | 20.601 | 0.092 |
PN23 | 27.922 | 0.019* |
†, Samples for which endpoint dilutions were performed.
The difference in log-likelihood scores between the best tree for that subalignment against the best tree for the alternative subalignment.
The probability of obtaining that difference in log-likelihoods by chance alone, given that the true trees are identical. *, P values significant at the 0.05 level. Note that, to be conservative, we only identify a sequence as a putative recombinant if both subalignments produce trees that are mutually (statistically) different.
The subalignment of sequences using the query sequence before the putative crossover point identified by RIP.
The subalignment of sequences using the query sequence after the putative crossover point identified by RIP.