Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul;12(7):1075–1079. doi: 10.1101/gr.132102

Table 2.

Statistical Significance of the Association of Short Repeats with Deletions and Tandem Duplications

LTR retrotransposon family Elements Deletions/duplications No. flanked by short DRsa No. of repeats in randomization test (Test 1) Bases in repeats Bases matching in 5′ and 3′ sequences No. of matching bases in randomization test (Test 2)








Mean ± SD (max.) P Mean ± SD (max.) P




(a) Deletions
Family 1 5 6 6 0.18 ± 0.43 (3) 3 × 10−11 40 37 9.5 ± 2.5 (19) 2 × 10−7
Family 2 5 8 4 0.17 ± 0.38 (2) 6 × 10−9 18 18 4.8 ± 1.8 (10) 4 × 10−4
Family 3 33 59 46 0.64 ± 0.79 (4) 6 × 10−15 281 251 62.6 ± 6.9 (87) 4 × 10−34
All three families 43 73 56 0.85 ± 0.90 (5) 3 × 10−14 339 306 76.6 ± 7.4 (101) 2 × 10−41
(b) Tandem duplications
Family 3 6 6 6 0.20 ± 0.44 (2) 2 × 10−10 26 25 6.2 ± 2.2 (15) 8 × 10−5
a

A repeat was considered as starting from the deletion or duplication breakpoint and was extended if the bases in the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences matched or (if there was a mismatching base) that mismatch was followed by at least 2 matching bases. The repeat was considered as stopping where a mismatch was followed by only 1 matching base.