Skip to main content
. 2002 Jan;160(1):81–90. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64352-0

Table 3.

Comparison of Array-Derived and Real-Time PCR Measured Ratios of Gene Expression in Hypoxic versus Normoxic Vessels

Gene/accession no. Array: signal ratio in experiment 1/2/3 Array: mean signal ratio ± SEM Real-time PCR (normalized to PBGD): ratio ± SEM
Procollagen 1 α1 subunit/U08020 7.79 /4.29/4.20 5.43 ± 1.18 2.49 ± 0.41
Procollagen 1 α2 subunit/X58251 4.46 /3.60/3.30 3.79 ± 0.35 2.34 ± 0.20
Procollagen 3 α1 subunit/X52046 2.81 /1.11/2.37 2.10 ± 0.51 2.26 ± 0.53
Carbonic anhydrase 3/M27796 Up /4.11/6.46 5.29 3.39 ± 0.78
Matrix gamma-carboxy-glutamate (gla) protein/D00613 3.29 /3.34/3.96 3.53 ± 0.22 2.38 ± 0.45
Non-muscle myosin light chain 3/U04443 2.22 /1.26/3.41 2.30 ± 0.62 1.35 ± 0.35
Serine proteinase inhibitor 3/U25844 1.94 /1.45/2.31 1.90 ± 0.25 1.84 ± 0.26
Cytochrome b-245 α polypeptide/M31775 2.15 /1.26/1.24 1.55 ± 0.30 1.45 ± 0.31
AXL receptor tyrosine kinase/X63535 1.53 /1.00/1.14 1.22 ± 0.16 1.52 ± 0.36

In three independent experiments, array comparison was performed. Nine genes with different extent of mRNA up-regulation during hypoxia were then additionally investigated by an alternative method. RNA was extracted from isolated vessels and quantified by real-time PCR. After normalization to the standard gene PBGD, the ratios of expression in hypoxic versus normoxic vessels were calculated (n = 3 each; mean ± SEM is given).