Table 2.
Cytological Screen of Kernels from Crosses Involving 9Bic-1
| Chromosome Constitutiona | Total | 20 A Chromosomes | 19A + 1 9Bic-1 | 19A | 19A + 2 9Bic-1 | 19A+ 1 9Bic-1 + 1 Tiny Fragment | 19A + 1 9L Fragment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kernel phenotype | |||||||
| Cross 1: ♀ c1/c1 × ♂ 9(C1)/9Bic-1(C1) + 2B | |||||||
| Colored embyro, colorless endosperm | 54 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 |
| Colorless embryo, colored endospermb | 28 | 18 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Colored embryo, mosiac endosperm | 29 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Both colored | 33 | 18 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1c | 0 |
| Random (mix of all above) | 40 | 16 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cross 1: ♀ 9(C1)/9Bic-1(C1) + 2B × ♂ c1/c1 | |||||||
| Both colored | 101 | 50 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A sampling of kernels from reciprocal crosses involving the c1 tester and 9(C1)/9Bic-1(C1) + 2B were germinated and the chromosome constitution examined.
The presence or absence of intact B chromosomes was not scored. When present, there were always two B chromosomes.
It is not possible to identify this kernel type with accuracy in this background. Misclassified kernels explain the recovery of plants with a standard chromosome 9.
The presence of a tiny chromosome in a single kernel of this phenotype is the only case that can not be explained via chromosome breakage.