Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Feb 13;92(5):1640–1646. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0572

Table 3.

The phenotypic correlation between obesity-related phenotypes and bone mass in 1,988 unrelated Chinese and 1,085 unrelated Caucasians, with bone mass unadjusted vs. adjusted for weight (in brackets)

Chinese
Lumbar Spine BMD (g/cm2) Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2) Total Body BMC (kg)
Fat mass (kg) 0.09** (−0.12**) 0.13** (−0.12**) 0.16** (−0.23**)
Lean mass (kg) 0.35**(0.15**) 0.38**(0.16**) 0.61**(0.29**)
Percentage fat mass (%) 0.02 (−0.16**) 0.05* (−0.15**) 0.02 (−0.30**)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.25** 0.29** 0.43**
Weight (Kg) 0.32** 0.34** 0.57**
Caucasians
Lumbar Spine BMD (g/cm2) Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2) Total Body BMC (kg)
Fat mass (kg) 0.13**(−0.12**) 0.24**(−0.13**) 0.04(−0.48**)
Lean mass (kg) 0.40**(0.10*) 0.52**(0.09*) 0.80**(0.36**)
Percentage fat mass (%) −0.14**(−0.17**) −0.12**(−0.18**) −0.46**(−0.65**)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.24** 0.36** 0.25**
Weight (Kg) 0.36** 0.51** 0.63**
*

Note: p<0.05,

**

p<0.01.

The values in brackets were the standardized regression coefficients when bone mass was adjusted for body weight