Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep 13;97(1):229–237. doi: 10.1152/jn.00677.2006

Table 2.

Percentage variance accounted for in binned mean fMRI time series by sustained and transient models of attention signals. In the sustained model, the attention signal was assumed to be a step function that began at cue presentation and continued until the end of the response period (as in Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 2). The transient model assumed an attention signal that was associated with allocation of attention at cue presentation but did not persist through the delay period. The sustained attention model accounted for more variance than the transient attention model for 22 out of 24 subject/cortical area combinations.

Attended part of visual field
Unattended part of visual field
Subject V1 V2 V3 V1 V2 V3
MAS - sustained 76 92 86 74 76 59
MAS - transient 16 10 15 49 48 41
DBR - sustained 74 83 85 69 60 21
DBR - transient 29 19 20 6 0.5 19
RAS - sustained 61 57 74 72 45 67
RAS - transient 51 39 38 50 18 25
JM - sustained 0.1 0.3 5 69 68 55
JM - transient 1 4 0.6 6 4 0.3
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure