Table 2.
Percentage variance accounted for in binned mean fMRI time series by sustained and transient models of attention signals. In the sustained model, the attention signal was assumed to be a step function that began at cue presentation and continued until the end of the response period (as in Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 2). The transient model assumed an attention signal that was associated with allocation of attention at cue presentation but did not persist through the delay period. The sustained attention model accounted for more variance than the transient attention model for 22 out of 24 subject/cortical area combinations.
Attended part of visual field
|
Unattended part of visual field
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject | V1 | V2 | V3 | V1 | V2 | V3 |
MAS - sustained | 76 | 92 | 86 | 74 | 76 | 59 |
MAS - transient | 16 | 10 | 15 | 49 | 48 | 41 |
DBR - sustained | 74 | 83 | 85 | 69 | 60 | 21 |
DBR - transient | 29 | 19 | 20 | 6 | 0.5 | 19 |
RAS - sustained | 61 | 57 | 74 | 72 | 45 | 67 |
RAS - transient | 51 | 39 | 38 | 50 | 18 | 25 |
JM - sustained | 0.1 | 0.3 | 5 | 69 | 68 | 55 |
JM - transient | 1 | 4 | 0.6 | 6 | 4 | 0.3 |