Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 25;35(2):968–978. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.056

Table 1.

Summary of effects

Effect Dependent variable Time window (ms) F-value p-value direction
Feedback valence
ERP 300–400 17.18* <.001* win>loss
ERP 400–600 3.66 .075 win>loss
Feedback valence: theta
Power 300–400 28.65* <.001* loss>win
Power 400–600 36.66* <.001* loss>win
Phase 300–400 8.84* .009* loss>win
Phase 400–600 6.51* .021* loss>win
Feedback valence: gamma
Power 300–400 4.91* .042* win>loss
Power 400–600
Phase 300–400
Phase 400–600
Reward probability: wins
ERP 300–400 22.28* <.001* 25>50>75
ERP 400–600 21.77* <.001* 25>50>75
Power 300–400 6.99* .007* 25>50>75
Power 400–600 6.52* .006* 25>50>75
Phase 300–400 22.89* <.001* 25>50>75
Phase 400–600 24.86* <.001* 25>50>75
Reward probability: losses
ERP 300–400
ERP 400–600
Power 300–400
Power 400–600 3.53* .043* 50>75>25
Phase 300–400
Phase 400–600
Learning: wins
ERP 300–400 3.84* .040*Ω 253>251; 751>733
ERP 400–600 8.45* .003* 253>251; 751>733
Power (theta) 300–400
Power (theta) 400–600
Phase (theta) 300–400
Phase (theta) 400–600
Learning: losses
ERP 300–400
ERP 400–600
Power (theta) 300–400
Power (theta) 400–600
Phase (theta) 300–400 2.06 .152
Phase (theta) 400–600 2.02 .155
*

Notes: indicates statistically significant effects. Subscripts indicate position within block (first third or last third). See text for degrees of freedom.

Ω

Results from all ERP analyses in the 300–400 ms window were also significant when using peak-to-peak measurements except this one. Only statistics from Fz are reported. Entries with an F-value less than 2 are omitted.