Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 19;8:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-130

Table 7.

Structural prediction accuracy statistics for the methods benchmarked over 2000 random 5S RNA selections.

Percent sequence similarity

20–40 40–60 60–80 80–100 0–100
Dynalign new constraint Sens 0.895 0.903 0.914 0.909 0.907
PPV 0.838 0.824 0.821 0.785 0.821
Dynalign M constraint Sens 0.892 0.901 0.912 0.909 0.905
PPV 0.837 0.821 0.815 0.786 0.817
FOLDALIGN Sens 0.726 0.753 0.787 0.510 0.749
PPV 0.772 0.784 0.803 0.572 0.778
StemLoc Sens 0.272 0.673 0.899 0.776 0.740
PPV 0.652 0.805 0.901 0.826 0.840
Consan Sens 0.666 0.799 0.931 0.865 0.842
PPV 0.671 0.761 0.817 0.722 0.775
Single Prediction Sens 0.680 0.722 0.766 0.784 0.739
PPV 0.603 0.632 0.672 0.673 0.647

Results are summarized for sequence similarity values ranging from 20% through 100% in steps of 20% and for the overall data set (0 – 100). Dynalign new constraint refers to Dynalign with probabilistic alignment constraints proposed here. Software version numbers and parameters for the algorithms are described in Section 7.6.