Table 1. FTF diagnosis and telediagnosis of teleconsultant A and B.
Case # | FTF diagnosis | Clinical telediagnosis | Dermoscopic telediagnosis | Image quality of clinical pictures | Image quality of dermoscopic pictures | ||||
A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | ||
1 | blue nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Good |
2 | dysplastic nevus¶ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair |
3 | dysplastic nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair |
4 | recurrent nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair |
5 | dysplastic nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good | Good | Good | Good |
6 | dysplastic nevus | 0* | 1 | 0* | 0* | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair |
7 | seborrheic keratosis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair |
8 | angioma | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Fair | Poor | Fair | Fair |
9 | melanoma¶ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good |
10 | congenital nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Fair | Fair | Poor | Poor |
11 | dysplastic nevus | 0† | 1 | 1 | 1 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor |
12 | dysplastic nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair |
13 | seborrheic keratosis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good |
14 | congenital nevus | 1 | 1 | 0‡ | 1 | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good |
15 | acral nevus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good | Good | Good | Good |
16 | dermatofibroma | 1 | 0§ | 1 | 1 | Good | Fair | Good | Good |
17 | angioma | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Fair | Poor | Good | Good |
18 | melanoma¶ | 1 | 0|| | 1 | 1 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good |
Diagnostic agreement | 16/18 | 16/18 | 16/18 | 17/18 | |||||
% | 89% | 89% | 89% | 94% |
FTF: face to face
A: teleconsultant A
B: teleconsultant B
1: agreement with FTF
0: disagreement with FTF
clinical and dermoscopic telediagnosis: melanoma
clinical telediagnosis: melanoma
dermoscopic telediagnosis: melanoma
clinical telediagnosis: dysplastic nevus
clinical telediagnosis: seborrheic keratosis
diagnosis confirmed histopathologically